Originally Posted by borandi
You can always, you know, realise that people can't quote real numbers or screenshots out of their ass any time of day. If you have a direct problem with me, then come out and say it, lets not beat around the bush here. We've all had experience, and these are mine. If they're different to yours, be methodical and courteous.
I'll admit, I don't run much 32m, only for competitions or when a new rare CPU crosses my desk, but those are my experiences nonetheless.
What are you on about? I have no personal issue with you, I take issue to what you've said because there are two of us here with exactly the same "opinion" and experiences to back that up. I have played with 32m heaaps, it is one of the most tweakable and consistent benchmarks that are awarded points on benchmark, definitely the pick of 32m stuff.
Your severe lack of experience with 32m shows, anybody who has taken the time of day to show just a little efficiency in their 32m runs will agree with what I'm saying here. You will NEVER see a 3s variance on the same OS and settings. It just doesn't happen.
Rob has a screenshot up with and without waza showing a 3s difference between them and it has led to this crap. I feel sorry for him and sorry for OCN. He's put the time and effort into what really is a great guide and it's tarnished with your inexperience and lack of want to try and replicate the bs claims you're making. I'll be very surprised if he bothers with another guide again, and that will be a shame for OCN because Rob has a lot to share.
EDIT: Reading over I guess I do have a little bit of a problem with you, but that's directly tied to what you've said in here.