Surprisingly, Intel has admitted that their latest Ivy Bridge platform runs hotter and its because of the increased thermal density which is the result of 22nm manufacturing node. Intel said, "users may observe higher operating temperatures when overclocking". They further added, "This is as designed and meets quality and reliability expectations for parts operating under specified conditions."
With tcase max at 105C its obvious enough 80C is normal for these chips. It's a big jump up from the tcase max of 72C on Sandy. Plain and simple they just like to run hot.
yes the 14 nm will be even hotter cause contrary to what intel mouth say,they are still on the prowl to find a solution to cool at those insanelly small level.and so far they have found solution at an affordable price
Anyone found where actually somebody from Intel said something like that?
Not random person that works at buffet or non-existing imagined Intel employee?
With tcase max at 105C its obvious enough 80C is normal for these chips. It's a big jump up from the tcase max of 72C on Sandy. Plain and simple they just like to run hot.
Anyone found where actually somebody from Intel said something like that?
Not random person that works at buffet or non-existing imagined Intel employee?
I see no reason to not believe The Inquirer. It has always been known that the shrink would cause an increase in (or at least equal) thermal density even if it lowered TDP.
Anyone found where actually somebody from Intel said something like that?
Not random person that works at buffet or non-existing imagined Intel employee?
Anyone found where actually somebody from Intel said something like that?
Not random person that works at buffet or non-existing imagined Intel employee?
Anyone found where actually somebody from Intel said something like that?
Not random person that works at buffet or non-existing imagined Intel employee?
It's not outputting more heat, the heat is simply taking longer to remove from the chip resulting in higher load temps. If it can handle running at those temperatures (and by handle I mean 100% stability) then there's no need for worry.
This much was obvious. It's getting the extra few degrees off your load temp that say, delidding it (for example) can possibly help with.
I wonder if we'll see some nut try directdiewatercooling. I would if I had one, and access to tools to make an acrylic top.
Surprisingly, Intel has admitted that their latest Ivy Bridge platform runs hotter and its because of the increased thermal density which is the result of 22nm manufacturing node. Intel said, "users may observe higher operating temperatures when overclocking". They further added, "This is as designed and meets quality and reliability expectations for parts operating under specified conditions."
While smaller processes increase heat density...... as the process matures, Intel will probably be able to reduce leakage and therefore less waste heat.
Surprisingly, Intel has admitted that their latest Ivy Bridge platform runs hotter and its because of the increased thermal density which is the result of 22nm manufacturing node. Intel said, "users may observe higher operating temperatures when overclocking". They further added, "This is as designed and meets quality and reliability expectations for parts operating under specified conditions."
While smaller processes increase heat density...... as the process matures, Intel will probably be able to reduce leakage and therefore less waste heat.
You don't design a CPU to have this much leakage or thermal issues. This is Intel's first trigate transistor and while that is an accomplisment, it's not what it should be but they need to sell them to recoup their investment. If you don't OC then the IB CPUs are OK, not great as they are only about 5% better than SB clock for clock. If you OC then SB is a better choice.
You don't design a CPU to have this much leakage or thermal issues. This is Intel's first trigate transistor and while that is an accomplisment, it's not what it should be but they need to sell them to recoup their investment. If you don't OC then the IB CPUs are OK, not great as they are only about 5% better than SB clock for clock. If you OC then IB is a better choice. http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2171299/intel-admits-ivy-bridge-chips-run-hotter
If you say so, SB is within 3% at the same clock speed and is more guaranteed to OC.
With the 2600/2700k pricecuts, i'd say SB is a great choice.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!