Originally Posted by Lovidore
The argument to this date still stands as IPS having the more color clarity as opposed to TN having a faster response time. The blur from the catleaps is fairly noticeable from what I've been able to gather in the forums.
One thing I need to point out from JassimH's post is that the catleaps aren't bound by RAMDAC, as those arent around anymore. It's bounded by the copper bandwidth housed by the dual link DVI and effectively the pixel clock, however everything else he said is pretty much correct.
While the Catleaps are a very attractive offer due to their cheap pricing and overclockability (if admin/chip do in fact cut a deal with bqvle's contact) it's better to go for TN if you want true 120Hz refresh rate for fast paced games such as BF3, CS:GO, MW3, etc.
Thanks for pointing out my mistake
, ramdac in my head = pixel clock (which it does NOT). Also good point about the cables
Could you elaborate on how/why the catleaps (@60hz) experience more blur than a 60hz tn panel would?
EDIT: AN OCNER FROM QATAR? THIS IS MADNESS. I only know about 3 people who are into PC's to a level remotely close to me IRL.