Quote:
Originally Posted by jtom320 
Right but I don't think that is what the thread was addressing. Whether it's right or not baseless speculation happens all the time especially on a forum. Now personally I wasn't expecting a huge increase on OCing ability but I thought perhaps 5ghz would become more commonplace and really good chips might go even further. I don't think this was a ridiculous prediction going off Intel's last four releases.
As I said though in my first post seeing as Ivy is still the fasted x86 quad money can buy I wouldn't say I was dissapointed per say but the heat issues did make me decide to just stick with my current chip rather then upgrading. My gpus are plenty fast without 3.0 and a 5% CPU increase is not high on my list of priorities.

Right but I don't think that is what the thread was addressing. Whether it's right or not baseless speculation happens all the time especially on a forum. Now personally I wasn't expecting a huge increase on OCing ability but I thought perhaps 5ghz would become more commonplace and really good chips might go even further. I don't think this was a ridiculous prediction going off Intel's last four releases.
As I said though in my first post seeing as Ivy is still the fasted x86 quad money can buy I wouldn't say I was dissapointed per say but the heat issues did make me decide to just stick with my current chip rather then upgrading. My gpus are plenty fast without 3.0 and a 5% CPU increase is not high on my list of priorities.
I agree with most everything you've said here.
I'm just saying that there is little excuse for people to have been surprised by the time launch date came around, and that a few generations of prior trend doesn't automatically mean the next generation is going to follow.











