Quote:
Originally Posted by forever109 
found it .
http://www.overclock.net/t/1231760/the-inquirer-nvidias-gtx680-gets-thrashed-by-amds-mid-range-radeon-hd-7870-in-gpu-compute

found it .
http://www.overclock.net/t/1231760/the-inquirer-nvidias-gtx680-gets-thrashed-by-amds-mid-range-radeon-hd-7870-in-gpu-compute
March 20th review your getting your facts from bud. The 680 didn't release until Mar 22 and all info was preliminary and meant nothing but speculation. You got your facts mixed up with unconfirmable information. No biggie.Thinking that the 7870 can beat a 7970 or 680 is kind of silly if you stop to think about it logically even without any benchmarks.
Now for some benches after the NDA lift.
Notice where the 7870 isn't being shown there is a 7950 bench in it's spot that's better than the 7870 and both the 7970 and 680 is beating it the 7950.
Just benches from a tech site that actually took the time to bench it after NDA lift rather than a story line speculating possible theories and they were dead wrong on.
Benchmark where the 680's don't even shine is beating the 7870.
- Back onto the topic -
Raising base core clock doesn't raise the over clock potential of the 7970 and nothing repeat NOTHING changes the performance with over clocked 7970 vs over clocked 680 being on par.
IF anything all it will do is come closer to the stock reviews being comparable to the 680 rather than showing the 680 beating it. A lot of people are missing this point thinking that somehow magically the 7970 is going to gain some sort of great margin of performance when both are over clocked.
Edited by Arizonian - 5/7/12 at 12:14am
























the GTX 680 is more power efficient than HD 7970 but that same power efficiency becomes irrelevant when its performance is held back significantly by bandwidth issues. I can't speak for others but if I were spending USD 500 i would rather spend it on a more future proof card even if I have to cope with a card which consumes more power. 