Quote:
SourceWhat's different with the $399 iPad 2 is that Apple used it as a vehicle to introduce a new hardware platform, or more specifically, a new SoC.
The 2,1 was WiFi-only, the 2,2 was GSM and the 2,3 was CDMA. The new addition to the family is the iPad 2,4. The 2,4 replaces the original iPad 2,1. It's also only available in a single capacity.
There's no known way to tell whether you're getting an iPad 2,4 vs. the older iPad 2,1 without opening the box. The 2,4 unit I ended up with was made in China, ruling out manufacturing region as a way of telling. The external box looks identical, as does the device itself.
The 2,1 was WiFi-only, the 2,2 was GSM and the 2,3 was CDMA. The new addition to the family is the iPad 2,4. The 2,4 replaces the original iPad 2,1. It's also only available in a single capacity.
There's no known way to tell whether you're getting an iPad 2,4 vs. the older iPad 2,1 without opening the box. The 2,4 unit I ended up with was made in China, ruling out manufacturing region as a way of telling. The external box looks identical, as does the device itself.
Very interesting move by Apple that makes a lot of sense to test the 32nm waters for the next iPhone. It's similar to how AMD used the HD4770 to test the 40nm process. The big downside is there is no way to know from the box whether it's an updated 32nm model or the older 45nm model. The iPad 3 definitely could have used this but it just wasn't ready soon enough and would have been very risky if things went wrong. Even now Apple is just testing the waters by selling both 32nm and 45nm iPad 2s along side each other. AnandTech mentions it's very hard to find one of these new models and Apple is also using the new 32nm process test on the Apple TV.
Edited by Ben the OCer - 5/4/12 at 1:14am









