Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [MT] NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 3DMark 11 Score Surface
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[MT] NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 3DMark 11 Score Surface

post #1 of 24
Thread Starter 
Leaked by TweakTown on Facebook:
Quote:
450
Quote:
TweakTown has been on an NDA breaking spree recently. They published GeForce GTX 680 review and Intel Ivy Bridge reviews well before official time. Today, they have posted 3DMark 11 scores of NVIDIA’s upcoming GeForce GTX 670 on their facebook page. This upcoming little monster from NVIDIA scored 9006 marks in Performance run of 3DMark 11. In recent TweakTown reviews, HD 7970 scored 8240, HD 7950 scored 7008 and GeForce GTX 580 scored 6884 marks in 3DMark 11. This puts GeForce GTX 670 right below its bigger brother GeForce GTX 680 which scored 9606.

Source: Maximum-Tech

One word...WOW
post #2 of 24
I'd be really excited for the 6xx series GPUs if they hadn't neutered the compute performance of them. AMD folding performance has always been terrible, and now Nvidia cut it out of their GPUs, leaving me little reason to buy a new GPU. I guess I'll wait for the 7xx series. For PC gamers though, the 6xx series is pretty sweet (minus the price).
Foldatron
(17 items)
 
Mat
(10 items)
 
Work iMac
(9 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 950 EVGA x58 3-way SLI EVGA GTX 660ti GTX 275 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
3x2GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 80GB Intel X25-M SSD 2TB WD Black 150GB WD Raptor 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
2x 150GB WD V-raptor in RAID0 Win7 Home 64-bit OEM 55" LED 120hz 1080p Vizio MS Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 
PowerCase
750W PC P&C Silencer CoolerMaster 690 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i5 2500S AMD 6770M 8GB (2x4GB) at 1333Mhz 1TB, 7200 rpm 
Optical DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
LG 8X Dual-Layer "SuperDrive" OS X Lion 27" iMac screen Mac wireless keyboard 
Mouse
Mac wireless mouse 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i7-2600K AMD 6970M 1GB 16GB PC3-10600 DDR3 1TB 7200rpm 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
256GB SSD 8x DL "SuperDrive" OS X 10.7 Lion 27" 2560x1440 iMac display 
Monitor
27" Apple thunderbolt display 
  hide details  
Reply
Foldatron
(17 items)
 
Mat
(10 items)
 
Work iMac
(9 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 950 EVGA x58 3-way SLI EVGA GTX 660ti GTX 275 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
3x2GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 80GB Intel X25-M SSD 2TB WD Black 150GB WD Raptor 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
2x 150GB WD V-raptor in RAID0 Win7 Home 64-bit OEM 55" LED 120hz 1080p Vizio MS Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 
PowerCase
750W PC P&C Silencer CoolerMaster 690 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i5 2500S AMD 6770M 8GB (2x4GB) at 1333Mhz 1TB, 7200 rpm 
Optical DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
LG 8X Dual-Layer "SuperDrive" OS X Lion 27" iMac screen Mac wireless keyboard 
Mouse
Mac wireless mouse 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i7-2600K AMD 6970M 1GB 16GB PC3-10600 DDR3 1TB 7200rpm 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
256GB SSD 8x DL "SuperDrive" OS X 10.7 Lion 27" 2560x1440 iMac display 
Monitor
27" Apple thunderbolt display 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 24
I'm quite skeptical about this.

Even if this is true, real world gaming performance is likely to be +/- 5% of the HD7950.

I just hope its more readily available and priced decently (wishful thinking I know)
post #4 of 24
I want them to compare those cards clock for clock, otherwise its kinda useless information
post #5 of 24
Why do they always focus on the P score. Who cares what the CPU/GPU combo score is. Forget the P score, that graphics score is only 700pts away from a stock 680, if the 670 is being run at stock. That's pretty impressive.
     
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel i5 2500K @ 4.5 [-35mV, LLC VH] Asus P8Z68-V/Gen3 SLI Asus GTX 470 [800, 1725, 1.037v, TX-4 applied] SLI Zotac GTX 470 [800, 1725, 1.087v, TX-4 appl... 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB [1600, CL8, 1.50v] 3xWestern Digital Caviar Blue 320GB [RAID 0] Lite-On Antec Kühler H2O 620 [2x120mm, TX-4 applied] 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Windows 7 [Home Premium 64-bit] Hanns.G HL272HPB [LED BL, 27 inch, 16:9] PCP&C Silencer MkII 950w X-Clio Windtunnel [2x250 stk, 1x120 TT 1225-T] 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Logitech G700 XTrac Ripper X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Creative 2.1 Speakers/Sub 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel E6600 Foxconn 775 MATX On-board 2GB 667 DDR2 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
320 WD XP 32bit teamviewer... Dell XPS 410 375w 
Case
skeleton de' Dell Dimension 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Atom Dual Core 1.6GHz Ion 330 2gb DDR2 800MHz 160GB 
OSMonitorKeyboardCase
Win 7 64 32 inch Vizio Generic Wireless Revo Net-top 
MouseMouse Pad
Generic Wireless Couch 
  hide details  
Reply
     
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel i5 2500K @ 4.5 [-35mV, LLC VH] Asus P8Z68-V/Gen3 SLI Asus GTX 470 [800, 1725, 1.037v, TX-4 applied] SLI Zotac GTX 470 [800, 1725, 1.087v, TX-4 appl... 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB [1600, CL8, 1.50v] 3xWestern Digital Caviar Blue 320GB [RAID 0] Lite-On Antec Kühler H2O 620 [2x120mm, TX-4 applied] 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Windows 7 [Home Premium 64-bit] Hanns.G HL272HPB [LED BL, 27 inch, 16:9] PCP&C Silencer MkII 950w X-Clio Windtunnel [2x250 stk, 1x120 TT 1225-T] 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Logitech G700 XTrac Ripper X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Creative 2.1 Speakers/Sub 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel E6600 Foxconn 775 MATX On-board 2GB 667 DDR2 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
320 WD XP 32bit teamviewer... Dell XPS 410 375w 
Case
skeleton de' Dell Dimension 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Atom Dual Core 1.6GHz Ion 330 2gb DDR2 800MHz 160GB 
OSMonitorKeyboardCase
Win 7 64 32 inch Vizio Generic Wireless Revo Net-top 
MouseMouse Pad
Generic Wireless Couch 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 24
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by noak View Post

I want them to compare those cards clock for clock, otherwise its kinda useless information

I think stock performance is what matters. Clock for clock comparison only gives an idea which architecture is better but in real life that doesnt matter if the other gpu is clocked higher.
post #7 of 24
If this is correct AND is stock I'll be surprised, nVidia would have two great & similar performing cards at I assume different price points... doesn't really make sense.
Valiance
(19 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel i7 2600k @ 1.4 [4.8Ghz | HT On] ASUS P8P67 PRO Rev. 3.1 Sapphire 7970 OC Edition @ 1200/1750 (1255/1850... Gigabyte Windforce 7970|Possibly looking to sell. 
RAMRAMHard DriveHard Drive
8GB Ripjaw X @ 2133 @ 9-11-11-28 8GB Samsung 30nm 9-11-11-28 @ 2133 (Still Testing) [OCZ Vertex 4 128GB] - [Corsair Force 3 90GB x2... [Crucial M4 128GB] - [Seagate 7200 RPM 500GB] 
CoolingCoolingOSMonitor
Corsair H80 Hydro 2x Corsair AF120s | 2x SP120s Windows 7 Ultimate 64 Bit Dell 19" 1440x900 [75Hz] 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
Toshiba 24" LED | 1920x1080 BenQ XL2410T [120Hz] Corsair K90 [Mechanical] /CM Quickfire Rapid [B... SeaSonic X-750 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair 500R Logitech MX518 Steel Series 
  hide details  
Reply
Valiance
(19 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel i7 2600k @ 1.4 [4.8Ghz | HT On] ASUS P8P67 PRO Rev. 3.1 Sapphire 7970 OC Edition @ 1200/1750 (1255/1850... Gigabyte Windforce 7970|Possibly looking to sell. 
RAMRAMHard DriveHard Drive
8GB Ripjaw X @ 2133 @ 9-11-11-28 8GB Samsung 30nm 9-11-11-28 @ 2133 (Still Testing) [OCZ Vertex 4 128GB] - [Corsair Force 3 90GB x2... [Crucial M4 128GB] - [Seagate 7200 RPM 500GB] 
CoolingCoolingOSMonitor
Corsair H80 Hydro 2x Corsair AF120s | 2x SP120s Windows 7 Ultimate 64 Bit Dell 19" 1440x900 [75Hz] 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
Toshiba 24" LED | 1920x1080 BenQ XL2410T [120Hz] Corsair K90 [Mechanical] /CM Quickfire Rapid [B... SeaSonic X-750 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Corsair 500R Logitech MX518 Steel Series 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by noak View Post

I want them to compare those cards clock for clock, otherwise its kinda useless information

What would be useless information is a clock for clock comparison. 7970 has 2048 cores while the 680 has 1536, so how do you compare them?
Saosin
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 2600K @ 4.7 Asus Gene-Z Gen3 EVGA GTX680 @ 1240/3500 16gb G.Skill Trident X @ 2133 9-11-9-28 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 128gb 830 - WD Velociraptor 300gb  2x Samsung 1tb F3 - 2x Samsung 2tb F4 Corsair H80 Win7 x64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Samsung 2443BW+ Leopold Cherry Browns  Corsair HX650 Fractal Design Define R3 
Audio
Asus Xonar D2X  
  hide details  
Reply
Saosin
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7 2600K @ 4.7 Asus Gene-Z Gen3 EVGA GTX680 @ 1240/3500 16gb G.Skill Trident X @ 2133 9-11-9-28 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 128gb 830 - WD Velociraptor 300gb  2x Samsung 1tb F3 - 2x Samsung 2tb F4 Corsair H80 Win7 x64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Samsung 2443BW+ Leopold Cherry Browns  Corsair HX650 Fractal Design Define R3 
Audio
Asus Xonar D2X  
  hide details  
Reply
post #9 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by noak View Post

I want them to compare those cards clock for clock, otherwise its kinda useless information

What would this prove? They are two very different architectures... this is meaningless.
post #10 of 24
please be true redface.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [MT] NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 3DMark 11 Score Surface