Quote:
Originally Posted by brettjv 
Interesting observation there Martyr.
I wonder if the amount of boost is determined by some algorithm that takes current conditions into account, or if it's just set in stone like you will ALWAYS get the 170 or 220 boost no matter what? Further, I wonder if it's hard-coded at the chip level when they make it, or if the amount of boost is somewhere in the bios?
I guess it doesn't matter that much if it's just a flat number that gets added to your OC, though ... since the OC itself isn't capped out. IOW, one can accomplish the same clocks with a 170 boost as one could with a 220 boost, just by OC'ing an extra 50MHz ... I'm correct on this, aren't I? I don't have a Kepler so I'm just trying to put 2+2 together here

Interesting observation there Martyr.
I wonder if the amount of boost is determined by some algorithm that takes current conditions into account, or if it's just set in stone like you will ALWAYS get the 170 or 220 boost no matter what? Further, I wonder if it's hard-coded at the chip level when they make it, or if the amount of boost is somewhere in the bios?
I guess it doesn't matter that much if it's just a flat number that gets added to your OC, though ... since the OC itself isn't capped out. IOW, one can accomplish the same clocks with a 170 boost as one could with a 220 boost, just by OC'ing an extra 50MHz ... I'm correct on this, aren't I? I don't have a Kepler so I'm just trying to put 2+2 together here
I don't think the boost clock is dynamic. Oridin's clocked 50 lower when running SLI in my machine. It seems it's preset.
Yes I'm leaning towards it not mattering much and the total limitation for OC potential is merely your max core clock.
But having said that, it would matter for things like a review on toms, etc. If they have a 220 boosting card for their 'stock test' run, up against a low clock 680, it may beat it in some tests, causing quite a stir, where a 170 boosting card may not.
Quote:
Do people really care about this? I mean seriously....people are arguing over a couple points here and there, and a 50 to 70 dollar difference.
It's moderately trivial. At this point it's mainly about providing information for people looking to upgrade their GPU.
But yeah, I'm still intrigued to see the full range of variation with this card on release day.
























