Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [VR-Zone] How the GeForce GTX 690 is a Prime Example of NVIDIA Reshaped?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[VR-Zone] How the GeForce GTX 690 is a Prime Example of NVIDIA Reshaped? - Page 5

post #41 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by zosothepage View Post

regardless of price the GTX 690 is the best card ever made

Not for me, if any card is showing weak in most demanding games, for me its fail, GTX690 lose in all Crysis/Metro 2033 benchmarks vs 7970 crossfire by large margin= bandwidth limited = far from best card ever.

On the other side 7970 in crossfire mostly sux, cause of drivers/stuttering so just skip this gen and no problem, (if your into details like me, that is)

I don't want to spent 1000$ on card which is limited in any way during playing of few demanding games which i want to play with mods/SSAA etc.
My System
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 2600K @4.8ghz(1.41v) 24/7 +D14 Maximus Extreme IV Sapphire 7950 OC (950) 1150/5900@1.16v 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws X @2133 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Samsung F3 Spinpoint & Crucial C300 128 GB (OS) Asus WIN 7 64 Ultimate NEC 2490wuxi (rev 1) 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Wave Cooler Master RP 1000W Cooler Master HAF 932 Logitech G5 
Mouse PadAudio
Cooler Master Adam A7x + Xonar STX+ HD595 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 2600K @4.8ghz(1.41v) 24/7 +D14 Maximus Extreme IV Sapphire 7950 OC (950) 1150/5900@1.16v 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws X @2133 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Samsung F3 Spinpoint & Crucial C300 128 GB (OS) Asus WIN 7 64 Ultimate NEC 2490wuxi (rev 1) 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Wave Cooler Master RP 1000W Cooler Master HAF 932 Logitech G5 
Mouse PadAudio
Cooler Master Adam A7x + Xonar STX+ HD595 
  hide details  
Reply
post #42 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by psyside View Post

Not for me, if any card is showing weak in most demanding games, for me its fail, GTX690 lose in all Crysis/Metro 2033 benchmarks vs 7970 crossfire by large margin= bandwidth limited = far from best card ever.
On the other side 7970 in crossfire mostly sux, cause of drivers/stuttering so just skip this gen and no problem, if your into details like me, that is) i don't want to spent 1000$ on card which is limited in any way during playing of few demanding games which i want to play with mods/SSAA etc.

Yeah neither card is exactly a world beater. The 9700pro/8800GTX were world beaters. They beat other cards of their generation and the cards afterward. You can't win half the gaming benchmarks and be the best card ever. It's actually funny that people post this all the time about the 6** series. The 580 was more impressive relative to the competition then the 680 is. With the 580 there was no argument about it's dominance.
OP MicroATX build
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 2500K Asus Pz68m pro EVGA GTX GTX 670 Corsair 8GB 1600 Vengence 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Crucial M4 Raid 0 Crucial M4 Raid 0 WD Data Drive LG Blu-Ray 
CoolingOSPowerCase
Antec Kuhler 920 Seasonic X series 750 gold Define Mini 
  hide details  
Reply
OP MicroATX build
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 2500K Asus Pz68m pro EVGA GTX GTX 670 Corsair 8GB 1600 Vengence 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Crucial M4 Raid 0 Crucial M4 Raid 0 WD Data Drive LG Blu-Ray 
CoolingOSPowerCase
Antec Kuhler 920 Seasonic X series 750 gold Define Mini 
  hide details  
Reply
post #43 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artikbot View Post

Yeah, of course it will perform better, there's a reason they fit more blocks tongue.gif
But from a performance per block standpoint, it will suck compared to the GTX680.
An anaolgy:
If the military were to design a gun that's the most lightweight they can make, they could probably make a gun that you can wear as a ring. But the firepower would render it unusable in real combat.
If they were to design the most powerful gun they could, it could very well blow up the entire planet, but it would have no use in combat because it'd be ginormous and eat a crapton of power (leaving humanity annihilation aside biggrin.gif).
I mean, you cannot have your cake and eat it, too.
I don't disagree with that at all... just the blanket statement of "it will suck at gaming" is untrue.

It will provide worse price/performance or performance/wattage for sure though.
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
post #44 of 114
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by psyside View Post

Not for me, if any card is showing weak in most demanding games, for me its fail, GTX690 lose in all Crysis/Metro 2033 benchmarks vs 7970 crossfire by large margin= bandwidth limited = far from best card ever.
On the other side 7970 in crossfire mostly sux, cause of drivers/stuttering so just skip this gen and no problem, (if your into details like me, that is)
I don't want to spent 1000$ on card which is limited in any way during playing of few demanding games which i want to play with mods/SSAA etc.

I just want to point out that 7970 cfx is by no means a single gfx card...
 
Benching
(24 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 3930K 5.3GHz @ 1.53v 24/7] [ASUS Rampage IV Extreme | EK-FB RE4] [ASUS GeForce GTX Titan 6GB 1254MHz] [16GB Corsair Vengeance] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[X25-MG2 80GB +2 SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0 +WDG 750GB] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [EK Coolstream XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Custom test bench] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUCPUMotherboard
FX 8320 8x Celeron 352 i7 3930K CVF, commando, 2x RIVE 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
Asus 4870x2 2x OEM Dell 3870x2 HIS 3870 Palit GTX 480 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
GTX 285 EVGA 8800GTX MSI X1600 (2d benching) 5850 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsRAM
Sapphire 5830 HIS 5770 Sapphire 4870 Corsair 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 2x old tek slims (GPU) 
CoolingOSPowerCase
Various watercooling stuff win7 AX1200 test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
Reply
 
Benching
(24 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 3930K 5.3GHz @ 1.53v 24/7] [ASUS Rampage IV Extreme | EK-FB RE4] [ASUS GeForce GTX Titan 6GB 1254MHz] [16GB Corsair Vengeance] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[X25-MG2 80GB +2 SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0 +WDG 750GB] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [EK Coolstream XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Custom test bench] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUCPUMotherboard
FX 8320 8x Celeron 352 i7 3930K CVF, commando, 2x RIVE 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
Asus 4870x2 2x OEM Dell 3870x2 HIS 3870 Palit GTX 480 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
GTX 285 EVGA 8800GTX MSI X1600 (2d benching) 5850 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsRAM
Sapphire 5830 HIS 5770 Sapphire 4870 Corsair 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 2x old tek slims (GPU) 
CoolingOSPowerCase
Various watercooling stuff win7 AX1200 test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
Reply
post #45 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alatar View Post

I just want to point out that 7970 cfx is by no means a single gfx card...

Neither is the 690.

Yes I know you mean it's ON a single card. devil.gif
Deus Ex Machina
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2500k Gigabyte Z68X-ED3H-B3 EVGA GTX 680 8GB (4 x 2GB) DDR3 1600 HyperX Genesis 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
256GB Samsung OEM SSD (SLOW POS) 64GB Samsung 830 64GB Crucial M4 Corsair H100 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit Alienware OptX AW2310 Saitek Eclipse Seasonic X750 
CaseMouseAudio
Corsair 650D Logitech G500 Creative Titanium HD 
  hide details  
Reply
Deus Ex Machina
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2500k Gigabyte Z68X-ED3H-B3 EVGA GTX 680 8GB (4 x 2GB) DDR3 1600 HyperX Genesis 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
256GB Samsung OEM SSD (SLOW POS) 64GB Samsung 830 64GB Crucial M4 Corsair H100 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit Alienware OptX AW2310 Saitek Eclipse Seasonic X750 
CaseMouseAudio
Corsair 650D Logitech G500 Creative Titanium HD 
  hide details  
Reply
post #46 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtom320 View Post

GPGPU will likely be heavily utilized in next generation games. Ambient Occlusion uses compute for example. To say it's useless is ridiculous. If PC gaming weren't as hamstrung by console development as it is we'd likely be seeing much wider applications of it now.
Also and I feel like I have to mention this in every thread Nvidia and AMD don't release sales numbers for their cards so why don't we stop acting like we have any idea.

I stand corrected actually. I was certain that I saw AMD well ahead on the Steam hardware survery;

http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey

However it turns out that Nvidia is more popular.

And that is a valid tool given the amount of people who use Steam. Its a very good cross section of the PC gaming community.

Also, if the apparent estimated tech advances are made on the game engine side of things over the next 3-5 years AO maps will be defunct anyway. With the rapid increase in GPU and CPU performance paired with game engines able to ever increase the poly counts after revised builds, AO maps wont be used for much longer I don't think. Especially if the point cloud rendering tech keeps improving. Then we will get rid of polygons all together which will mean no more need for AO maps since we can use real light and depth data due to the added visual fidelity.
post #47 of 114
Exacltly, Vengeance. Agreed fully. thumb.gif

Nvidia did the right thing. They now separate desktops, workstations and supercomputers. Gamers couldn`t give a rats ass about GPGPU, now we are heard and get better FPS performance in games instead. AMD went the wrong route, catering for all groups and watching the gaming performance go down and the power consumption and heat go up.

Stop making excuses for AMD, jtom320. GPGPU will never be generally used with games.
post #48 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vengeance47 View Post

And that is a valid tool given the amount of people who use Steam. Its a very good cross section of the PC gaming community.

It's actually a pretty crude survey IMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloudfire777 View Post

Exacltly, Vengeance. Agreed fully. thumb.gif
Nvidia did the right thing. They now separate desktops, workstations and supercomputers. Gamers couldn`t give a rats ass about GPGPU, now we are heard and get better FPS performance in games instead. AMD went the wrong route, catering for all groups and watching the gaming performance go down and the power consumption and heat go up.
Stop making excuses for AMD, jtom320. GPGPU will never be generally used with games.

AMD isn't going GPGPU just for kicks. It's part of their HSA master plan. AMD's going a different direction than Nvidia, for good reason.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom 9750 (stock) MSI MS-7548 (Aspen) HD 6950 @ 971/1387 1.25v 8GB DDR2 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
750GB Windows 7 64-bit ASUS VH238H 1920x1080 Seasonic X-650 Gold 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Rosewill Smart One Razer Naga Razer Scarab 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom 9750 (stock) MSI MS-7548 (Aspen) HD 6950 @ 971/1387 1.25v 8GB DDR2 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
750GB Windows 7 64-bit ASUS VH238H 1920x1080 Seasonic X-650 Gold 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Rosewill Smart One Razer Naga Razer Scarab 
  hide details  
Reply
post #49 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieHo View Post

Yes, but you were comparing two different generations. Next generation mid-range cards traditionally have been around the performance of prior generation flagships.

Hmmm ?

Aren't we talking about the exact same thing here ?

The midrange, gaming oriented GTX 660, turned into GTX 680 by clocking it higher than the original design, was faster than the previous generation flagship GTX 580 even at the original GTX 660 stock clocks, in the same way the gaming oriented GTX 460 1 GB is faster than the previous generation GTX 285.
Edited by tpi2007 - 5/8/12 at 9:18am
 
Metro 2033 review
Metro 2033
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7-3820 Asus Sabertooth X79 Gigabyte GTX 480 16 GB Corsair DDR3 1866 Mhz Dominator 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Intel SSD 320 120GB + WD Caviar Black 1TB + 500GB Sony Optiarc DVD-RW Corsair A70, Noiseblocker M12-P + AC Accelero X... Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG Flatron L204WT Logitech wireless Corsair AX750 Professional Modular 80 Plus Gold Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus 
Mouse
Logitech optical wireless 
  hide details  
Reply
 
Metro 2033 review
Metro 2033
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i7-3820 Asus Sabertooth X79 Gigabyte GTX 480 16 GB Corsair DDR3 1866 Mhz Dominator 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Intel SSD 320 120GB + WD Caviar Black 1TB + 500GB Sony Optiarc DVD-RW Corsair A70, Noiseblocker M12-P + AC Accelero X... Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
LG Flatron L204WT Logitech wireless Corsair AX750 Professional Modular 80 Plus Gold Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus 
Mouse
Logitech optical wireless 
  hide details  
Reply
post #50 of 114
I still really feel like AMD's drivers are holding the 7970 back. I dont think we've seen a performance increase with new drivers on this card yet. I would think that eventually the drivers will mature and we shoukd see at least a modest increase in performance. Of course its driver team is one of Nvidia's biggest strengths...
Night Fury
(19 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 3960X C2 (5 GHz) Asus Rampage IV Extreme 2 x EVGA GTX Titan SC in SLI Patriot Viper Xtreme 2133MHz (4 x 4GB)  
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Corsair Force 3 240GB  Intel 320 160GB  Hitachi Deskstar 1TB Samsung Blu-ray player 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
EK Supreme HF EK RIVE Blocks 2 x EK FC Titan  2 x Hardware Labs Black Ice GTX Extreme rads (5... 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Alphacool VPP655 D5 pump with Bitspower pump to... Windows 8 Pro 2 x Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSB Microsoft Sidewinder X6 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair AX1200 Silverstone TJ11 Corsair M60  
  hide details  
Reply
Night Fury
(19 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 3960X C2 (5 GHz) Asus Rampage IV Extreme 2 x EVGA GTX Titan SC in SLI Patriot Viper Xtreme 2133MHz (4 x 4GB)  
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Corsair Force 3 240GB  Intel 320 160GB  Hitachi Deskstar 1TB Samsung Blu-ray player 
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
EK Supreme HF EK RIVE Blocks 2 x EK FC Titan  2 x Hardware Labs Black Ice GTX Extreme rads (5... 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Alphacool VPP655 D5 pump with Bitspower pump to... Windows 8 Pro 2 x Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSB Microsoft Sidewinder X6 
PowerCaseMouse
Corsair AX1200 Silverstone TJ11 Corsair M60  
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [VR-Zone] How the GeForce GTX 690 is a Prime Example of NVIDIA Reshaped?