Originally Posted by kikkO
The topic is about design
, but you insist on derailing the topic with your straw man arguments.
I don't care if you owned Porsches, it is irrelevant to the TOPIC.
The topic is about design and you go off on what a car "does on the road."
Allow me to reiterate one last time since it so happens to slip your mind time and time again.
The topic is on DESIGN.
Porsche got it's design from the VW Beetle, added it's own touch and became very popular. Apple looked at current designs for devices and added it's own touch and made them immensely popular. Therefore no one cares who invented it, make a big deal all you want, the current hysteria is not about who invented it or who the original design belonged to. It's about who matters and as much as you people hate to admit it you non-Apple devices don't really matter, it's all about Apple right now and you non-Apple users can't seem to wrap your head around it.
You're just butthurt about a popular device you dislike because the product(s) you own aren't as popular. You're just mad and frustrated at Apple's success, plain and simple.
formula m… No one cares about your logic and reasoning. No one cares how long you take to make informed decisions. No one cares if you like to pay cash and no one cares if marketing has zero effect on you. Companies don't care about people like you, they don't make money off people like you, you are a small percentage, you are irrelevant to a company's profit margin.
I don't fancy Apple products, I see and accept things for what they are without stereotypes or bias
which many of you seem to excel at.
Apple did not become a half trillion dollar company with people like you. Apple made it's billions selling a culture, a culture in products that you non-Apple products lack and are bitter about. It's the age old losers being bitter at the winner.
Instead of "expressing" your opinion on a forum why don't you go out and do something about it, make a product(s) that's more popular that Apple's. In the end you're all talk.
I am afraid u live in a different world than me.
I owned an Apple IIe and nothing has changed since. Each and every product has to stand & compete on it's own merit, not because it has an Apple emblem on it. How ludicrous of you to assume that anyone other than vane people care about Apple products, they don't..!
Granted, children and youth are lobotomized by TV and they WANT and iPhone, iPad, etc.. but they also cannot afford such things. Others just buy Apple because the warm comfy feeling they get when knowing everyone else is in the same boat, safety in numbers mentality. (How many bought an iPhone for it's 4G, keyboard, or 4.3" display...?)
Coincidentally, 1/2 of a Trillion doesn't make your products better, or your argument right, it just illustrates how greedy Steve Jobs was and why employees were jumping off roofs @ Foxconn killing themselves, for his greed! (Now, he has answered for it)
You sound like an online marketer trying to sell Apple based on an unknown-effect.. Apple has zero effect on people who knows the company, & again only kids (12 ~ 25) are influenced by the brand, not the product... the product doesn't matter for them, as long as they feel apart of the Apple crowd, those people are happy.
"Those people" = vanity
Porsches design is not what sells the cars, it is their performance that makes them iconic. Rear engine, read wheel drive, 2 seater sportscar. The fact that partial Porsche dna is derived from the VW beetle means nothing within this discussion, because VW own Porsche and there has never been any litigation.
Sheetmetal is sheetmetal and no car manufacturer is suing another for using steel to build, or cover their cars. Nobody is stealing Porsche's design, but they are using the same materials.
"Silver" is a method of production of continuous steel, a material. The process looks the same on nearly any product, so it is LAUGHABLE when you see a company like Apple complain, because nearly everyone of their products is based solely on LOOKS, not technology or use.
If people see a shiny silvery metallic device and think it's from Apple, (but instead HP)... too bad!
Perhaps Apple should've spent $500 million innovating some unknown tech to establish their devices apart from the rest of the crowd. But that would actually take money and work and have a time cost associated with it. It is much easier just to pay lawyers, than to actually invent something.
Lastly, don't question me, ....then ignorantly try to rebuttal personal iota that you've illicited. Makes no sense..