Quote:
Originally Posted by
randomizer 
I don't think the medical analogy works. Parents who take their virus-infected child to the doctor and demand to be given antibiotics to fix it are (a small) part of the reason why antibiotic resistances are increasing. In this case the semantics are important.
I see your point entirely. However, 'virus' has become the term for malicious software in the dictionary of most users.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
randomizer 
I don't think that semantics matter as much for IT security, since there is no negative consequence to getting the terminology wrong (you may just find that you don't fix the problem). In all cases you want to get rid of malware regardless of what type it is, and if you have to use 40 different utilities to clean up your PC before you find one that works then so be it. You don't need to learn the semantics to fix the problem, just to fix it faster.
Definitely, but my point was that people are intentionally derailing discussion topics with "There are no viruses"... It doesn't matter that there are no viruses it matters that vulnerabilities exist. Telling any average user "There are no viruses" puts them into a false sense of security, and doesn't help with encouraging safe behavior and proper security practices. I'm all for educating the general public, but for the sake of discussion refrain from semantics. I can't tell you how many arguments I've gotten in with mac users who are convinced that their system is immune from all threats, INCLUDING IDENTITY THEFT. They simply reply "It's a mac"...
The whole point of the article is focusing on that the semantics behind "virus" and "malware" is intentionally designed to detract from the object of vulnerabilities existing in an effort of saving face, and that it needs to stop. As Ed put it, "It is cyber-......." It's one thing if troubleshooting issues, but it's another when a customer/client
needs to know that they need to practice safe computing behaviors.
Edited by MediaRocker - 5/13/12 at 8:53am