Really, there isn't any point answering you as my point has pretty much sailed over your head and you are also contradicting yourself.
Just take this line you posted for instance:
The whole reason there is no offline mode is apparently to protect the integrity of the monetization/micro-transaction scheme that is the auction house (something I'm sure we'd all love to see take priority in future games).
They validate removing the option to play the game solo-offline like older Diablo games had, so they can make a money making scheme work better (ie without people messing with it), even though making an offline experience that cannot be linked with/has nothing to do with their game servers would prevent that.
More options = better for the consumer.
Am I right?
You'll need to stop arguing with your own sense of morality before we progress.
Edited by GrizzleBoy - 5/18/12 at 11:20am
Just take this line you posted for instance:
Quote:
100% false. It is completely optional to use the auction houses. More options = better for the consumer.
The whole reason there is no offline mode is apparently to protect the integrity of the monetization/micro-transaction scheme that is the auction house (something I'm sure we'd all love to see take priority in future games).
They validate removing the option to play the game solo-offline like older Diablo games had, so they can make a money making scheme work better (ie without people messing with it), even though making an offline experience that cannot be linked with/has nothing to do with their game servers would prevent that.
More options = better for the consumer.
Am I right?
You'll need to stop arguing with your own sense of morality before we progress.
Edited by GrizzleBoy - 5/18/12 at 11:20am








