Since heat output and performance is a bust with ivybridge, many who were holding out for ivybridge to upgrade have been considering settling on a cheaper sandybridge for cooler running. With phase change being what's needed to push past matching sandybridge, this led me to wonder, how far could ivybridge be overclocked while matching the power consumption of sandybridge?
ie. Instead of a 4.5ghz ivy on air roughly matching a 5hz sandy on performance with fewer watts, a faster ivy running at the same watts.
From this bit-tech review: http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2012/04/23/intel-core-i7-3770k-review/8, there's at least a ~69+ watt margin(though they're clocked @ 4.8) to stuff phase change cooler and higher clocks.
Can phase change + higher clocks be stuffed inside 69 watts, and how much higher mhz?
edit: fixed the borked url, and 69 watts.
Edited by keiths - 5/21/12 at 8:20pm
ie. Instead of a 4.5ghz ivy on air roughly matching a 5hz sandy on performance with fewer watts, a faster ivy running at the same watts.
From this bit-tech review: http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2012/04/23/intel-core-i7-3770k-review/8, there's at least a ~69+ watt margin(though they're clocked @ 4.8) to stuff phase change cooler and higher clocks.
Can phase change + higher clocks be stuffed inside 69 watts, and how much higher mhz?
edit: fixed the borked url, and 69 watts.
Edited by keiths - 5/21/12 at 8:20pm








