Quote:
Originally Posted by
Darkpriest667 
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GREG MISO 
I think everyone is reading into this too much. They aren't just going to drop out it doesn't work that way. You have to remember that even though bulldozer was a flop, so was ivy bridge in the sense that they hyped it so much and there's little better about it and simply doesn't overclock like sb. Also amd has broken tons of records in the industry and is still the king of performance per dollar on the low end. I have hope for amd!!
-Greg
It wasnt hyped to kill everything and its mother like bulldozer was.
I waited for bulldozer.. bought a 990FX board as did many others and I think you'd find a good percentage of those like me that waited for bulldozer have since switched to intel. I bet in the enthusiast market they lost a HUGE amount of customers.
The enthusiast market doesn't make your processor successful, unfortunately. We're the minority of the computing world. However, your point is valid.
In response to GREG, IB wasn't a fail. It's fast as anything, it uses less power (albeit not much less, wait for the revision). Bulldozer was slower, clock for clock than prior generation. It used more power as well. Ivy Bridge is faster than prior generation clock for clock. It also consumes less power.
The only thing Bulldozer has going for it is the potential to overclock the ever loving crap out of it subzero temperature wise.