Quote:
Originally Posted by Flying Toilet 
Wait... I'm confused. Where exactly did Read say that they were backing out? He said that there was plenty of processing power on laptops. "Thin and light movement" would confirm him talking specifically about laptops. There isn't anything mentioned about desktops until Tom's weighs in on it. I really think this is being taken out of context and blown out of proportion, AMD has a pretty large stake in servers, it'd be pretty hard to digest them bowing out to Intel because of per-core performance when the desktop and server silicon is joined at the hip.

Wait... I'm confused. Where exactly did Read say that they were backing out? He said that there was plenty of processing power on laptops. "Thin and light movement" would confirm him talking specifically about laptops. There isn't anything mentioned about desktops until Tom's weighs in on it. I really think this is being taken out of context and blown out of proportion, AMD has a pretty large stake in servers, it'd be pretty hard to digest them bowing out to Intel because of per-core performance when the desktop and server silicon is joined at the hip.
They didn't ever say anything like they were backing out

As GREG MISO said people just read the title (this is a very common issue on ocn...) and ASSUMEd (we all know what assuming does....
) that AMD was giving up, when they're not. They're changing directions to a more profitable segment of the market.











