Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › NVIDIA › Thinking about buying a GTX 670 for the CUDA cores for 3D Rendering, anyone know much about CUDA?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Thinking about buying a GTX 670 for the CUDA cores for 3D Rendering, anyone know much about CUDA?

post #1 of 19
Thread Starter 
GTX 670's have 1344 CUDA Cores while my 550 Ti has 192. That's 7 times the amount.

I'd like to know if 7x the CUDA cores would get me 7x the performance rendering scenes with Blender, and if it would be faster per CUDA Core because the 670 is a better card or not.

I game a lot on this computer and I've been doing fine with the 550 Ti but I hooked up my 1050p TV and by that I know I'm going to need a new card for when I get a 1080p monitor. At the moment I'm playing around with Blender and the Render times are pretty long, if I want them to come out nice, I'm using the Cycles Renderer which uses the GPU to render with, and I want to know if upgrading to a card with 7x the CUDA cores will give me around 7x the performance for stuff that uses the CUDA cores.

I'm aware that most games won't benefit from more cores, so I do not believe I will get anywhere near 7x the FPS in games and I do not expect that. I do however expect that games with heavy PhysX will benefit from it though, but there aren't many of those out yet.
i7 Sandy
(8 items)
 
Skylake Pentium
(8 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2600K ASRock Z75 Pro3 GTX 970 16GB 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung 850 Evo WinXP Pro / Win7 Pro 1080p 60Hz Thermaltake Smart M850W 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Pentium G4400 ASRock H110M-HDV GTX 550 Ti 8GB (2x4) 
Hard DriveOSPowerOther
250GB SSD Windows 7 500W 300Mbps WLAN 
  hide details  
Reply
i7 Sandy
(8 items)
 
Skylake Pentium
(8 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2600K ASRock Z75 Pro3 GTX 970 16GB 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung 850 Evo WinXP Pro / Win7 Pro 1080p 60Hz Thermaltake Smart M850W 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Pentium G4400 ASRock H110M-HDV GTX 550 Ti 8GB (2x4) 
Hard DriveOSPowerOther
250GB SSD Windows 7 500W 300Mbps WLAN 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 19
Nope.
Firstly, the CUDA cores in the 6xx range aren't the same as the CUDA cores in the 5xx range, also the 'Compute' ability of the GPU is a little bit crippled in Kepler. It is better to get a GTX 580 than a 680 for 3D rendering.
post #3 of 19
Like McMogg said, they're not the same CUDA cores. Two different architectures and they can't really be directly compared. Fermi had great compute performance, Kepler does not. Its slower than GTX 500 and AMD 7900 in almost every compute benchmark, other than compute shader programs I believe.
Le Tigre
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i7-3770k MSI Z77 MPower Gigabyte R9-290 Gigabyte R9-290 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung DDR3 2133 9-10-10-26-1T Samsung 830 OCZ Agility 4 Western Digital Caviar Black 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8.1 Auria EQ276W 27" IPS Logitech G710+ XFX Pro 1050W 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
NZXT Switch 810 Razer 3.5G Steelseries 9HD Soundblaster Tactic3D Wrath 
  hide details  
Reply
Le Tigre
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i7-3770k MSI Z77 MPower Gigabyte R9-290 Gigabyte R9-290 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Samsung DDR3 2133 9-10-10-26-1T Samsung 830 OCZ Agility 4 Western Digital Caviar Black 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8.1 Auria EQ276W 27" IPS Logitech G710+ XFX Pro 1050W 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
NZXT Switch 810 Razer 3.5G Steelseries 9HD Soundblaster Tactic3D Wrath 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 19
Thread Starter 
That's a surprise!
Could this maybe be improved with a driver update or do you think the 500 series will always be better for CUDA stuff?

If you can link me to some of the benchmarks you've seen that'd be nice, I like to know as much as I can before making a purchase.


Edit: I did very little googling before, and I read something about the amount of cuda cores is crippled due to the low VRAM on the cards out now, if I were to get a card with more ram, would that solve it?
i7 Sandy
(8 items)
 
Skylake Pentium
(8 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2600K ASRock Z75 Pro3 GTX 970 16GB 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung 850 Evo WinXP Pro / Win7 Pro 1080p 60Hz Thermaltake Smart M850W 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Pentium G4400 ASRock H110M-HDV GTX 550 Ti 8GB (2x4) 
Hard DriveOSPowerOther
250GB SSD Windows 7 500W 300Mbps WLAN 
  hide details  
Reply
i7 Sandy
(8 items)
 
Skylake Pentium
(8 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2600K ASRock Z75 Pro3 GTX 970 16GB 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung 850 Evo WinXP Pro / Win7 Pro 1080p 60Hz Thermaltake Smart M850W 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Pentium G4400 ASRock H110M-HDV GTX 550 Ti 8GB (2x4) 
Hard DriveOSPowerOther
250GB SSD Windows 7 500W 300Mbps WLAN 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5 of 19
If you're serious about 3D rendering, you'll need to go and do a bit of research and tell us what apps you'll be using. In addition, you'll want to be looking at Quadro workstation-class cards for this type of work.
SG06
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5-3570S 65W ASRock Z77E-ITX VisionTek AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB Reference G.SKILL Sniper DDR3-2400 (@ 1866 9-10-10-28) 2x8GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingCooling
Crucial m4 256GB Toshiba P300 3TB Prolimatech Samuel 17 Noctua NF-F12 
OSMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Windows 10 Pro x64 HP Omen 32" HP Pavilion 27xi Das Model S Professional Silent 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Silverstone SST-ST45SF Silverstone SG06 Microsoft Intellimouse Realtek ALC898 
  hide details  
Reply
SG06
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5-3570S 65W ASRock Z77E-ITX VisionTek AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB Reference G.SKILL Sniper DDR3-2400 (@ 1866 9-10-10-28) 2x8GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingCooling
Crucial m4 256GB Toshiba P300 3TB Prolimatech Samuel 17 Noctua NF-F12 
OSMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Windows 10 Pro x64 HP Omen 32" HP Pavilion 27xi Das Model S Professional Silent 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Silverstone SST-ST45SF Silverstone SG06 Microsoft Intellimouse Realtek ALC898 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 19
Thread Starter 
I'm more serious about the gaming, I've only recently gained an interest in 3D so I'm looking to get good performance for gaming but I'd like to have good render times as well.

I have a spare computer I can use to throw my 550 Ti into and set it up to render as a slave to help once I've fully learned it and want to make some cool stuff, but as it is right now I'm looking for a card that will get me a nice performance increase from this 550 for rendering, and to keep good FPS while gaming when I get my new monitor.


Right now I am using Blender with the Cycles renderer, using my GPU to do the work. My scenes are rendered at low res with few textures as of now and low geometry to cut down on render times, I'd like to work at a faster pace with better models and textures.

I don't see myself moving away from blender because I'm not doing any professional work, nor am I getting payed. I don't have access to a cheap copy of any of the paid software either, so I'm kind of stuck with Blender and liking it.

When I get my monitor upgrade, it will be 1080P or preferably 1920x1200 and I want good performance at that res.
i7 Sandy
(8 items)
 
Skylake Pentium
(8 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2600K ASRock Z75 Pro3 GTX 970 16GB 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung 850 Evo WinXP Pro / Win7 Pro 1080p 60Hz Thermaltake Smart M850W 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Pentium G4400 ASRock H110M-HDV GTX 550 Ti 8GB (2x4) 
Hard DriveOSPowerOther
250GB SSD Windows 7 500W 300Mbps WLAN 
  hide details  
Reply
i7 Sandy
(8 items)
 
Skylake Pentium
(8 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2600K ASRock Z75 Pro3 GTX 970 16GB 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung 850 Evo WinXP Pro / Win7 Pro 1080p 60Hz Thermaltake Smart M850W 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Pentium G4400 ASRock H110M-HDV GTX 550 Ti 8GB (2x4) 
Hard DriveOSPowerOther
250GB SSD Windows 7 500W 300Mbps WLAN 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 19
Well that screams 'GTX 580!' at me..

Get the 3GB version, (heck, get it second hand and cheap!) and then it will hold its own for that kinda stuff.. the 500 series still has a good computer performance, that's why folders haven't moved to 6xx yet..
post #8 of 19
Thread Starter 
I've read a little bit about the gk104 chip, and it appears that it's 1/24 of something while the 500 series fermi is 1/8, and the next line of the 600 series based on the GK110 will have a larger memory interface and be the 1/8 as fermi is, with 33% more CUDA cores.

To me it looks like they rushed into releasing the 680 to compete with AMD and the real kepler has yet to come out.

Can someone help me find some benchmarks comparing the 550 TI and the 580 in rendering tests, not gaming? All I can seem to find is gaming comparisons and although they look nice, it's not helping me :\
i7 Sandy
(8 items)
 
Skylake Pentium
(8 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2600K ASRock Z75 Pro3 GTX 970 16GB 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung 850 Evo WinXP Pro / Win7 Pro 1080p 60Hz Thermaltake Smart M850W 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Pentium G4400 ASRock H110M-HDV GTX 550 Ti 8GB (2x4) 
Hard DriveOSPowerOther
250GB SSD Windows 7 500W 300Mbps WLAN 
  hide details  
Reply
i7 Sandy
(8 items)
 
Skylake Pentium
(8 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2600K ASRock Z75 Pro3 GTX 970 16GB 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung 850 Evo WinXP Pro / Win7 Pro 1080p 60Hz Thermaltake Smart M850W 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Pentium G4400 ASRock H110M-HDV GTX 550 Ti 8GB (2x4) 
Hard DriveOSPowerOther
250GB SSD Windows 7 500W 300Mbps WLAN 
  hide details  
Reply
post #9 of 19
that:s exactly what they did, they were producing GK104 to be used in the mid range (<660) and then realised it can compete with the 7970, so released it as the GTX680, whilst they were still finishing GK110.

I will try to find you some rendering comparisons asap smile.gif
post #10 of 19
Thread Starter 
That'd be great.

I can find benches for games no problem but gpgpu stuff is tricky to find for me, best I found was a general statement with no proof stating pretty much the following: Workstation cards>580>680>570

I'm curious to see some numbers smile.gif


By the way, do you have any clue what AMD is up to in terms of their response to the coming GK110 other than factory overclocking their current cards?
i7 Sandy
(8 items)
 
Skylake Pentium
(8 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2600K ASRock Z75 Pro3 GTX 970 16GB 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung 850 Evo WinXP Pro / Win7 Pro 1080p 60Hz Thermaltake Smart M850W 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Pentium G4400 ASRock H110M-HDV GTX 550 Ti 8GB (2x4) 
Hard DriveOSPowerOther
250GB SSD Windows 7 500W 300Mbps WLAN 
  hide details  
Reply
i7 Sandy
(8 items)
 
Skylake Pentium
(8 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-2600K ASRock Z75 Pro3 GTX 970 16GB 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung 850 Evo WinXP Pro / Win7 Pro 1080p 60Hz Thermaltake Smart M850W 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Pentium G4400 ASRock H110M-HDV GTX 550 Ti 8GB (2x4) 
Hard DriveOSPowerOther
250GB SSD Windows 7 500W 300Mbps WLAN 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: NVIDIA
Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › NVIDIA › Thinking about buying a GTX 670 for the CUDA cores for 3D Rendering, anyone know much about CUDA?