For the first time ever I have 2 hard drives, 1 640GB and 1 500GB. Both 7200RPM, one is Hitachi (don't yell at me, it works fine) and one is WD. I obviously have the options of either leaving them be separate and maybe have one with just a few files on it as a system drive so it starts faster, and one as storage for music, games, pictures, movies, etc. or RAID 0 because they're not too fast at transferring large files OR RAID 1 even though I don't have any important things like work documents or taxes, just entertainment stuff.
I don't have a hardware RAID controller is the thing and I've heard integrated RAID controllers suck. Is this true or one of those things that's exaggerated to keep idiots from possibly losing important data?
MSI h55m-e23 if it matters. I'll fill out my system in about 13 seconds.
Oh and if you think a real RAID controller is the best option then show me a cheap one that works with 2 drives and is PCIe x1
Edited by Minnetonka16 - 6/11/12 at 9:25am
I don't have a hardware RAID controller is the thing and I've heard integrated RAID controllers suck. Is this true or one of those things that's exaggerated to keep idiots from possibly losing important data?
MSI h55m-e23 if it matters. I'll fill out my system in about 13 seconds.
Oh and if you think a real RAID controller is the best option then show me a cheap one that works with 2 drives and is PCIe x1
Edited by Minnetonka16 - 6/11/12 at 9:25am







