Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › Difference between the FX-60 and the New Core2
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Difference between the FX-60 and the New Core2

post #1 of 10
Thread Starter 
Well i'm trying to understand CPUs a little better and i'm wondering what makes the new Core2 CPUs better than AMDs FX-60. What are some of the stand out features that make it better and faster.

Also i'm just curious but how much would you think my rig would go for if I sold it around April?
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD64 FX60 A8R32-MVP Radeon 1900XTX 512mb 2GB Corsair XMS DDR550 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x 74GB WDRaptor Raid 0 PLEXTOR Windows XP Pro SAMSUNG 214T 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 ENERMAX EG851AX 660W Thermaltake Armor BLK Logitech G5 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD64 FX60 A8R32-MVP Radeon 1900XTX 512mb 2GB Corsair XMS DDR550 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x 74GB WDRaptor Raid 0 PLEXTOR Windows XP Pro SAMSUNG 214T 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 ENERMAX EG851AX 660W Thermaltake Armor BLK Logitech G5 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 10
The Core 2 Duos, or Conroes, are faster then the FX-60 and the AM2 CPUs because they do 12 ops per second compared to the Athlon939/AM2's 9 and P4's 6. Thats why they can be much faster at lower GHz. They are also 65nm compared to AMD's 90nm so they can OC higher and still be very stable.

For your rig (not including mouse, keyboard, or montior), right now maybe about $1600, and in April... under $1000.
My Rigasaurus-reX
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Toledo 3800 X2 E6 (CCBWE) DFI nF4 LanParty Ultra-D XFX 6800GS 500/1200 2x512MB OCZ Enhanced Latency 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
250GB WD-Caviar 16M 3GB/s NEC ND-3550A Windows XP Pro SP2 17in. ŁĊĐ 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G11 Åntec TRUEPOWERII 550W ThermalTake Tsunami Logitech G7 Wireless 
Mouse Pad
SteelPad S&S 
  hide details  
Reply
My Rigasaurus-reX
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Toledo 3800 X2 E6 (CCBWE) DFI nF4 LanParty Ultra-D XFX 6800GS 500/1200 2x512MB OCZ Enhanced Latency 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
250GB WD-Caviar 16M 3GB/s NEC ND-3550A Windows XP Pro SP2 17in. ŁĊĐ 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G11 Åntec TRUEPOWERII 550W ThermalTake Tsunami Logitech G7 Wireless 
Mouse Pad
SteelPad S&S 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacKz5o
The Core 2 Duos, or Conroes, are faster then the FX-60 and the AM2 CPUs because they do 12 ops per second compared to the Athlon939/AM2's 9 and P4's 6. Thats why they can be much faster at lower GHz. They are also 65nm compared to AMD's 90nm so they can OC higher and still be very stable.

For your rig, right now maybe about $1600, and in April... under $1000.
That sums it up basically. Also Conroe has a much better Architecture.
post #4 of 10
Thread Starter 
Thanks for clearing that up for me. Also what does 65nm mean?

And is AMD making a new CPU to compete with the Core2?
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD64 FX60 A8R32-MVP Radeon 1900XTX 512mb 2GB Corsair XMS DDR550 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x 74GB WDRaptor Raid 0 PLEXTOR Windows XP Pro SAMSUNG 214T 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 ENERMAX EG851AX 660W Thermaltake Armor BLK Logitech G5 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD64 FX60 A8R32-MVP Radeon 1900XTX 512mb 2GB Corsair XMS DDR550 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2x 74GB WDRaptor Raid 0 PLEXTOR Windows XP Pro SAMSUNG 214T 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 ENERMAX EG851AX 660W Thermaltake Armor BLK Logitech G5 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5 of 10
65NM Is the Die ( Core ) fabrication size. Its the amount transistors on the chip i beleive the less the better . This is because it produces less heat than its 90nm counter parts.
post #6 of 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Floyd_
Thanks for clearing that up for me. Also what does 65nm mean?

And is AMD making a new CPU to compete with the Core2?
65nm = 65 nanometer, its how the data is processed, the lower the number the more efficient, less power consumption, better OC, and even a bit faster I think. AMD is still working on their K8L to compete with the C2Ds but when they're going to release it... nobody knows
My Rigasaurus-reX
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Toledo 3800 X2 E6 (CCBWE) DFI nF4 LanParty Ultra-D XFX 6800GS 500/1200 2x512MB OCZ Enhanced Latency 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
250GB WD-Caviar 16M 3GB/s NEC ND-3550A Windows XP Pro SP2 17in. ŁĊĐ 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G11 Åntec TRUEPOWERII 550W ThermalTake Tsunami Logitech G7 Wireless 
Mouse Pad
SteelPad S&S 
  hide details  
Reply
My Rigasaurus-reX
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Toledo 3800 X2 E6 (CCBWE) DFI nF4 LanParty Ultra-D XFX 6800GS 500/1200 2x512MB OCZ Enhanced Latency 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
250GB WD-Caviar 16M 3GB/s NEC ND-3550A Windows XP Pro SP2 17in. ŁĊĐ 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G11 Åntec TRUEPOWERII 550W ThermalTake Tsunami Logitech G7 Wireless 
Mouse Pad
SteelPad S&S 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 10
There is way more to it than just 12ops to 9 ops, for example, what exactly allows the core 2 duo to do 12 ops. There is *so* much more that I can't even begin to understand without putting hours upon hours into reading about it.

K8L is out Q2 or H2 (don't remember which) of '07 and it is going to compete with both kentfields and core 2 duo and maybe yorksfield
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Opteron 148 DFI Ultra-D EVGA 7600GT KO 2x512mb Patriot LLK(TCCD) 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung SP2504C XP SP2 17" CRT Zippy GSM-6600P 600W 
Case
Centurion 5 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Opteron 148 DFI Ultra-D EVGA 7600GT KO 2x512mb Patriot LLK(TCCD) 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung SP2504C XP SP2 17" CRT Zippy GSM-6600P 600W 
Case
Centurion 5 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8 of 10
Don't forget, the Conroe also has 4MB of L2 cache

I hope AMD comes back to the lead again. They were always ahead of Intel... AMD had the first 8th generation processor in 2003 and Intel didn't catch up until summer 2006.
Computer
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Quad Q6600 ASUS P5E X38 8800Ultra OC Crucial Ballistix 2GB 
Hard DriveMonitorKeyboardPower
Western Digital Raptor Samsung 940BX nord lead 2X Seasonic S12 650W 
Case
Lian Li PC-65B 
  hide details  
Reply
Computer
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Quad Q6600 ASUS P5E X38 8800Ultra OC Crucial Ballistix 2GB 
Hard DriveMonitorKeyboardPower
Western Digital Raptor Samsung 940BX nord lead 2X Seasonic S12 650W 
Case
Lian Li PC-65B 
  hide details  
Reply
post #9 of 10
L2 cache size doesn't affect K8 anywhere near it does for Core 2 Duo. K8 doesn't have latency problems, Core 2 Duo on the other hand does, and the insane cache sizes are a way to mask it.

AMD WILL take back the performance for at the very least a couple of months, after that it's all down to how well Yorksfield performs
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Opteron 148 DFI Ultra-D EVGA 7600GT KO 2x512mb Patriot LLK(TCCD) 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung SP2504C XP SP2 17" CRT Zippy GSM-6600P 600W 
Case
Centurion 5 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Opteron 148 DFI Ultra-D EVGA 7600GT KO 2x512mb Patriot LLK(TCCD) 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung SP2504C XP SP2 17" CRT Zippy GSM-6600P 600W 
Case
Centurion 5 
  hide details  
Reply
post #10 of 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by indignation
Don't forget, the Conroe also has 4MB of L2 cache

I hope AMD comes back to the lead again. They were always ahead of Intel... AMD had the first 8th generation processor in 2003 and Intel didn't catch up until summer 2006.
Well the Conroe Core will have 4mb l2 cache but the Alendale has 2 mb l2.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD CPUs
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › Difference between the FX-60 and the New Core2