Quote:
Originally Posted by Sapientia 
This argument is entirely ridiculous. Why is the 680 called mid range? Mid range implies there's something above it-- there isn't. The fabled GK100 never came to market, and may have never even seen the light of day. The decision to make GK104 the flagship Geforce card was made long before Nvidia knew of Tahiti.
As for AMD releasing the Ghz edition, I don't see how they're ripping off their customers. The 28nm process is simply maturing, and they're able to make higher clocked cards now than they were in December of 2011. Intel and AMD release new steppings of CPUs all the time, but no one seems to make an argument against it. Because pushing more mature fab processes just makes sense.

This argument is entirely ridiculous. Why is the 680 called mid range? Mid range implies there's something above it-- there isn't. The fabled GK100 never came to market, and may have never even seen the light of day. The decision to make GK104 the flagship Geforce card was made long before Nvidia knew of Tahiti.
As for AMD releasing the Ghz edition, I don't see how they're ripping off their customers. The 28nm process is simply maturing, and they're able to make higher clocked cards now than they were in December of 2011. Intel and AMD release new steppings of CPUs all the time, but no one seems to make an argument against it. Because pushing more mature fab processes just makes sense.
This


























