Quote:
Originally Posted by erunion 
That's not the case.
Your argument lies on the assumption that everything is equal between steam and origin, thus a different of opinion between the two is a result of inconsistency. However, everything is not equal between steam and origin, so your argument falls on its face.
This is what is called circular logic. You have assumed what you must prove.
That's not the case.
Your argument lies on the assumption that everything is equal between steam and origin, thus a different of opinion between the two is a result of inconsistency. However, everything is not equal between steam and origin, so your argument falls on its face.
This is what is called circular logic. You have assumed what you must prove.
No, my argument dwells on the fact that a person is down rating a product (to be more accurate) for using a business practice that was pioneered by a product he supports.
Quote:
I don't like how McDonalds makes it so you can only buy a McChicken Sandwich at McDonalds.
its actually one of the reasons why I dont eat McChicken Sandwiches........
But maybe if McDonalds would sell McChicken Sandwiches in Burger King, I'd consider buying one so that I can eat it with my "king" fries that are exclusive to Burger King.[/QUOTE
its actually one of the reasons why I dont eat McChicken Sandwiches........
But maybe if McDonalds would sell McChicken Sandwiches in Burger King, I'd consider buying one so that I can eat it with my "king" fries that are exclusive to Burger King.[/QUOTE
Edited by GrizzleBoy - 6/27/12 at 1:54pm
It's-a tu maaach
(12 items) |
|
It's-a tu maaach
(12 items) |
