Quote:
Originally Posted by L D4WG 
I wonder if there is a connection between the people who refuse to buy Windows 8 if there is no start button and age?
My theory is that they are older chaps who were around during the release of Windows 95 and earlier, the kind of people who hate change for no reason and just like to complain....

I wonder if there is a connection between the people who refuse to buy Windows 8 if there is no start button and age?
My theory is that they are older chaps who were around during the release of Windows 95 and earlier, the kind of people who hate change for no reason and just like to complain....

I was 5 when Windows 95 released. I'd hardly call myself an 'older chap' being 22 and while I'm not refusing to buy Windows 8 and am definitely open to change. I believe Windows 8 is changing for the worse, in the desktop environment anyway.
Tablets and desktops are not the same and I would say are hardly used for the same purposes as each other, so why the need for a unified OS? I am using a highly accurate method of an input called a mouse, I do not need to fiddle my way through obtrusive animations and barriers that force me to replicate swiping and touch inputs to be presented with tiles the size of my fist and fingers.
In the corporate environment I work in I honestly see little to no benefit to the Metro UI, for both myself and other IT personnel and the clients and I am not saying it just to hate. In this environment no one needs a real time weather, stocks, photo or other rubbish tiles pushed in their face. Most clients in this workforce will log-in, open Outlook, IE to access web based + remote applications, MS Office applications, Explorer and little else. Metro DOES NOT aid in this at all and I personally think it will hinder their productivity.
I do not need tiles to open AD, GPP, Outlook, Orca, SCCM or any of the other tools I need so why must I and other desktop users aiming for productivity and business be forced through a dodgy tiling job of an extra step to jump back to the Aero UI.
How many people have you OCN users and Metro supporters seen using WIN 7 based tablets? I'm guessing very few if any at all, that is because while WIN 7 supports touch devices through gestures and other aids, realistically it fails as a touch based UI. It is too cumbersome and 'accurate' to be used effectively through touch or anything other than a mouse, and maybe stylus. This is where Win 8 and Metro belong, tablets and touch interfaces.
Surface is a prime example, that is the first case that I have seen WIN 8 running and actually gone "wow" probably due in part to the hardware it's running on but I thought to myself 'I could actually buy a Surface and use Metro and Win 8 and be comfortable with it'.
Oh, and on a side note. People aren't exactly rushing out in droves to buy into Metro on WP. Why they put such a massive gamble on this UI is beyond me.
Edited by jtickner1 - 6/28/12 at 10:09pm











