Quote:
Originally Posted by
996gt2
Am I correct in saying that the VRM design on the Maximus V Extreme is essentially the same as that on my Maximus IV GENE-Z?
Maximus V Extreme:

Maximus IV GENE-Z:
If this is true, doesn't it mean that the older Maximus IV Extreme-Z had a higher quality VRM design?
For reference, here is the VRM on the Maximus IV Extreme/Extreme-Z. Note the NEC Prodalizer and the different MOSFETs.

Yes on all counts.
However he VRM up there there is nothing deficient about it, it is very strong. Very good. Ivy Bridge uses like no power, so what is the point of over the top and over the top VRM?
Now the IC they use for the drivers/doubler, it is the same GB uses IR3598, however asus re-brands it(puts their own writing on it). This little IC has the ability to have two sets of driver outputs from one PWm input, or you can configure it to have two sets of driver outputs from two PWM inputs. So you would use 4 of them to double 4 phases to 8 phases, or you would use 4 of them to drive 8 phases from 8 phases. In the case of the Gene it is doubling 4 phases as the PWm is a 7+1 phase, thus it is more cost effective to use the +1 to drive the iGPU and then you are left with 7, of which 4 would be used and doubled. In the case of the same PWM, EVGA uses the same PWM but has a 7+1 phase VRM, in which they use IR3550. Marketing likes higher phase count.
I would bet that the Extreme uses the 8 phases driven by 8 phases, so instead of 7+1 the PWm would be 8+0 mode.