Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [TH] AMD Desktop Trinity Update: Now With Core i3 And A8-3870K
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[TH] AMD Desktop Trinity Update: Now With Core i3 And A8-3870K - Page 5

post #41 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nintendo Maniac 64 View Post

EDIT: Wait, if we're supposed to ignore price and performance, then how does one even determine which platforms are supposed to compete?
I added performance by accident...meant only price.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010rig View Post

You really think they WANTED to drop their "high end" 8150 by $70? They HAD to in order to compete. Just look at their processor prices, it's a mess.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819113005
Then you have this...
Edited by Seronx - 7/2/12 at 7:00pm
AMD FX ~Seronx
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX-8320 ASRock Fatal1ty 990FX Professional NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 GeIL EVO Leggara 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
2x120 Raid 0 SSDs, 2TB HDD Sony BWU-500S Phanteks PH-TC14CS_WH Windows 8 64-bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Alienware AW2210 OptX Razer Blackwidow Ultimate ABS Majesty 900 Watts 80PLUS Gold NZXT Source 220 
MouseMouse PadAudio
CM Storm Spawn Razer Megasoma Realtek 892 onboard soundcard 
  hide details  
Reply
AMD FX ~Seronx
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX-8320 ASRock Fatal1ty 990FX Professional NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 GeIL EVO Leggara 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
2x120 Raid 0 SSDs, 2TB HDD Sony BWU-500S Phanteks PH-TC14CS_WH Windows 8 64-bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Alienware AW2210 OptX Razer Blackwidow Ultimate ABS Majesty 900 Watts 80PLUS Gold NZXT Source 220 
MouseMouse PadAudio
CM Storm Spawn Razer Megasoma Realtek 892 onboard soundcard 
  hide details  
Reply
post #42 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010rig View Post

Intel wouldn't cost more either if it had more competition.

Just because Intel owners won't recognize AMD as competition doesn't mean that it isn't. The only thing that this really proves is that for less money I can play quite a few games for a lot less that it would cost me to go Intel.
post #43 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by fivestring View Post

Just because Intel owners won't recognize AMD as competition doesn't mean that it isn't. The only thing that this really proves is that for less money I can play quite a few games for a lot less that it would cost me to go Intel.

In terms of processor, it is priced according to its performance. Back in the beginning of x64 era, AMD priced their processor higher than Intel counterpart.

It is what it is, Intel has the performance crown, so Intel priced it higher.
Misaka
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5-3570K ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Sapphire HD 7850 2 GB Samsung DDR3 16 GB (30 nm) 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 128 GB WD Caviar Blue 1 TB Lite-on DVD Burner Thermalright Venomous X 
OSOSMonitorKeyboard
Windows 7 Professional x64 (Host) Crunchbang Linux x64 (Guest) HP 2311x HP PS/2 Keyboard 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Rosewill Capstone 450 W Rosewill Challenger Logitech M570 ASUS Xonar D1 
Other
Hauppauge HVR-1250 
  hide details  
Reply
Misaka
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5-3570K ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Sapphire HD 7850 2 GB Samsung DDR3 16 GB (30 nm) 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 128 GB WD Caviar Blue 1 TB Lite-on DVD Burner Thermalright Venomous X 
OSOSMonitorKeyboard
Windows 7 Professional x64 (Host) Crunchbang Linux x64 (Guest) HP 2311x HP PS/2 Keyboard 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Rosewill Capstone 450 W Rosewill Challenger Logitech M570 ASUS Xonar D1 
Other
Hauppauge HVR-1250 
  hide details  
Reply
post #44 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by trumpet-205 View Post

In terms of processor, it is priced according to its performance. Back in the beginning of x64 era, AMD priced their processor higher than Intel counterpart.
It is what it is, Intel has the performance crown, so Intel priced it higher.

But look at all the game benchmarks. Higher prices get you lower performance in games. That makes sense to me:rolleyes:
post #45 of 136
good performance, I just wish they tested gaming with some discrete graphics and power consumption,
also ivy bridge Core i3 is probably going to be released soon (before desktop trinity), higher IPC and higher clock for the same price (I think) compared to the 2100,
but obviously HD2500 and HD4000 can't compete with the A10 graphics,
post #46 of 136
sadly the exact intel counter of amd isnt exact!in fact i suspect they make sure we cant exactly pin one to the other as counter and let reviewer decide!

best bet!ignore counter!on average cpu doesnt have a lot of say in the mather for gamer!and everybody know if your application is processor intensive go intel!
as far as i know average user wont max say a fx 8150!or a fx 4100!something will prevent them first ,like their web connection,their ssd,their pcie!etc etc etc
as for hd4000 not competing with amd apu?till intel finally release the official hd4000 driver nobody will know,i dont know why it take them so long to finish the thing!everybody expect hd4000 not to be able to keep up with trinity,but seeing how long after lunch intel is taking!i aint so sure anymore!intel look dead serious about beating the hell out of amd in the apu industry!and i cant blame intel.they have other fish to fry soon way bigger on the mobile sector then amd(arm)intel has to win vs amd trinity on all front!or they ll face arm with doubt!
Edited by drbaltazar - 7/2/12 at 7:34pm
post #47 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by fivestring View Post

But look at all the game benchmarks. Higher prices get you lower performance in games. That makes sense to me:rolleyes:

When you use integrated GPU for gaming yes. For workstation/computation/encoding/emulation purpose, no.

Overall Intel is faster. If you truly care about gaming SB Pentium is cheaper yet retains 95% of the gaming performance from i3-2100.
Misaka
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5-3570K ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Sapphire HD 7850 2 GB Samsung DDR3 16 GB (30 nm) 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 128 GB WD Caviar Blue 1 TB Lite-on DVD Burner Thermalright Venomous X 
OSOSMonitorKeyboard
Windows 7 Professional x64 (Host) Crunchbang Linux x64 (Guest) HP 2311x HP PS/2 Keyboard 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Rosewill Capstone 450 W Rosewill Challenger Logitech M570 ASUS Xonar D1 
Other
Hauppauge HVR-1250 
  hide details  
Reply
Misaka
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5-3570K ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Sapphire HD 7850 2 GB Samsung DDR3 16 GB (30 nm) 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 128 GB WD Caviar Blue 1 TB Lite-on DVD Burner Thermalright Venomous X 
OSOSMonitorKeyboard
Windows 7 Professional x64 (Host) Crunchbang Linux x64 (Guest) HP 2311x HP PS/2 Keyboard 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Rosewill Capstone 450 W Rosewill Challenger Logitech M570 ASUS Xonar D1 
Other
Hauppauge HVR-1250 
  hide details  
Reply
post #48 of 136
drbaltazar, I know you use a translator, but I really haven't a clue what you just said...

Anyway, aren't a good amount of productivity programs multi-threaded, therefore making the A10 better than the i3 in that case? I mean, the only productivity program that the i3 beat the A10 in was Premiere Pro. (the i3 also won in iTunes if you care)
Edited by Nintendo Maniac 64 - 7/2/12 at 7:32pm
     
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
4800+X2 (65nm G2, no IHS) 1GHz/.775v-3.1GHz/1.375v Gigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H [WinXP] integrated Radeon 4200 [Win7] EVGA 8800GS 384MB @ 0.95v (passive @ idle) 
RAMRAMHard DriveHard Drive
Corsair XMS2 2x1GB DDR2 667MHz Kingston 2x1GB DDR2 800MHz Crucial M4 128GB SSD - CT128M4SSD2 RamDisk - adaptive 2GB viotle scratch 
Optical DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
LG 16x DVD-RW DL Athlon 64 125w stock heatpipe heatsink 140mm case fan used as CPU fan @ ~600rpm 120mm Kingwin case fan used as PSU fan @ ~600rpm 
OSOSMonitorKeyboard
Windows XP Performance Edition - 32bit SP3 Windows 7 Ultimate - 64bit SP1 E772p CRT (Trinitron) @ 79-94hz 1152x864/1280x720 Logitech Cordless Desktop EX 100 
PowerMouseMouse PadAudio
Antec EA-380D (380w) with stock fan removed Logitech Cordless Optical Mouse My bed Turtle Beach Riviera 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Atom D270 @ 990MHz-1.6GHz (1C/2T) Intel 945 GMA 2GB Corsair DDR2 32GB OCZ Onyx SSD 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
RamDisk - adaptive 768MB viotle scratch  Tiny integrated fan Windows XP SP3 "Performance Edition" Integrated 1024x600 LED-backlit LCD display 
KeyboardPowerMouseAudio
Integrated keyboard Smallest in-line power brick I've ever seen Integrated multi-touch touchpad Integrated Realtek HD Audio 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Celeron E1400 1.2-2.0GHz @ 1.188v ECS 945g-M3 integrated Intel 945G Corsair ValueSelect 1GB DDR2 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
OCZ Onyx 32GB SSD - boot drive Western Digital Caviar SE - 320GB IDE Maxtor - 200GB IDE RamDisk - adaptive 256MB viotle scratch 
CoolingCoolingOSMonitor
Cooler Master RR-LEE-L911-GP CPU heatsink Athlon 64 x2 4800+ (65nm, G2) stock CPU fan Windows 7 Ultimate lite - SP1 32bit None - VNC is used instead 
PowerCaseOtherOther
Bestec ATX-250-12Z HP Pavilion 8650C Zonet ZEW2500P USB wifi (b/g) adapter integrated Realtek ethernet controller 
OtherOther
Intel PCI ethernet card Linksys PCI ethernet card 
  hide details  
Reply
     
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
4800+X2 (65nm G2, no IHS) 1GHz/.775v-3.1GHz/1.375v Gigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H [WinXP] integrated Radeon 4200 [Win7] EVGA 8800GS 384MB @ 0.95v (passive @ idle) 
RAMRAMHard DriveHard Drive
Corsair XMS2 2x1GB DDR2 667MHz Kingston 2x1GB DDR2 800MHz Crucial M4 128GB SSD - CT128M4SSD2 RamDisk - adaptive 2GB viotle scratch 
Optical DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
LG 16x DVD-RW DL Athlon 64 125w stock heatpipe heatsink 140mm case fan used as CPU fan @ ~600rpm 120mm Kingwin case fan used as PSU fan @ ~600rpm 
OSOSMonitorKeyboard
Windows XP Performance Edition - 32bit SP3 Windows 7 Ultimate - 64bit SP1 E772p CRT (Trinitron) @ 79-94hz 1152x864/1280x720 Logitech Cordless Desktop EX 100 
PowerMouseMouse PadAudio
Antec EA-380D (380w) with stock fan removed Logitech Cordless Optical Mouse My bed Turtle Beach Riviera 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Atom D270 @ 990MHz-1.6GHz (1C/2T) Intel 945 GMA 2GB Corsair DDR2 32GB OCZ Onyx SSD 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
RamDisk - adaptive 768MB viotle scratch  Tiny integrated fan Windows XP SP3 "Performance Edition" Integrated 1024x600 LED-backlit LCD display 
KeyboardPowerMouseAudio
Integrated keyboard Smallest in-line power brick I've ever seen Integrated multi-touch touchpad Integrated Realtek HD Audio 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Celeron E1400 1.2-2.0GHz @ 1.188v ECS 945g-M3 integrated Intel 945G Corsair ValueSelect 1GB DDR2 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
OCZ Onyx 32GB SSD - boot drive Western Digital Caviar SE - 320GB IDE Maxtor - 200GB IDE RamDisk - adaptive 256MB viotle scratch 
CoolingCoolingOSMonitor
Cooler Master RR-LEE-L911-GP CPU heatsink Athlon 64 x2 4800+ (65nm, G2) stock CPU fan Windows 7 Ultimate lite - SP1 32bit None - VNC is used instead 
PowerCaseOtherOther
Bestec ATX-250-12Z HP Pavilion 8650C Zonet ZEW2500P USB wifi (b/g) adapter integrated Realtek ethernet controller 
OtherOther
Intel PCI ethernet card Linksys PCI ethernet card 
  hide details  
Reply
post #49 of 136
And they still are using winrar 4.11...
Teh computerer
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD K15 Crosshair V Formula Club 3D 7970 Royal Queen Kingston  
RAMHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Kingston  Kingston HyperX WD Caviar Blue Corsair H100 
OSMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Windows 7 Home Premium HP 2309m ViewSonic VA902 Microsoft Sidewinder X6 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Nexus NX-5000 530W Cooler Master HAF X CM Storm Inferno CM Storm Tactics 
Audio
Logitech X-530 5.1 
  hide details  
Reply
Teh computerer
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD K15 Crosshair V Formula Club 3D 7970 Royal Queen Kingston  
RAMHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Kingston  Kingston HyperX WD Caviar Blue Corsair H100 
OSMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Windows 7 Home Premium HP 2309m ViewSonic VA902 Microsoft Sidewinder X6 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Nexus NX-5000 530W Cooler Master HAF X CM Storm Inferno CM Storm Tactics 
Audio
Logitech X-530 5.1 
  hide details  
Reply
post #50 of 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by trumpet-205 View Post

When you use integrated GPU for gaming yes. For workstation/computation/encoding/emulation purpose, no.
Overall Intel is faster. If you truly care about gaming SB Pentium is cheaper yet retains 95% of the gaming performance from i3-2100.

I don't think you can say overall. They traded blows for the most part and walked Intel in gaming. I don't think that AMD claimed this was a workstation CPU so tha'ts not a fair comparison.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [TH] AMD Desktop Trinity Update: Now With Core i3 And A8-3870K