Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [FUD] AMD 8350 is a 4.0GHz eight-core
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[FUD] AMD 8350 is a 4.0GHz eight-core - Page 10

post #91 of 198
AMD needs to increase the core to clock performances of their cores, not the speed. If I overclocked a Bulldozer processor to 4.5 GHz it still might not even overcome an i7 2600K processor at stock.
Solitude R2.0
(16 items)
 
Klein
(12 items)
 
Lappy
(6 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T @ 4.0 GHz ASUS M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 DiRT 3 Edition Corsair 8GB Vengeance Blue @ 1600MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Western Digital 1TB Caviar Blue Samsung 830 Series 128GB SSD LITE-ON iHAS 424-98 Corsair H80 + 2X Corsair 120MM Fans 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 64-Bit Ultimate Samsung S27A350H 27" LED Backlit HDMI Monitor Lenovo SK-8815 Corsair 850W Professional Series Gold 
CaseMouseAudio
Cooler Master 690 II Advanced Microsoft Basic Optical Mouse Plantronics GameCom 367 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i3-2125 Asus P8H77-I Intel HD 3000 Samsung Green 30nm 2x4GB MV-3V4G3D/US 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Crucial M4 128GB  Asus DRW-24B1ST Intel Stock Cooler Windows 8 Pro 
KeyboardPowerCaseOther
Microsoft Wireless Keyboard 800 Corsair Builder Series CX500V2 Lian Li PC-Q11B TrendNet TEW-684UB 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5-3210M Dell 04G65K Intel HD4000 Dell 2x4GB 1600MHz 
Hard DriveOS
Seagate/WD 1TB 5400RPM Windows 7 Home Premium 
  hide details  
Reply
Solitude R2.0
(16 items)
 
Klein
(12 items)
 
Lappy
(6 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T @ 4.0 GHz ASUS M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 DiRT 3 Edition Corsair 8GB Vengeance Blue @ 1600MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Western Digital 1TB Caviar Blue Samsung 830 Series 128GB SSD LITE-ON iHAS 424-98 Corsair H80 + 2X Corsair 120MM Fans 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 64-Bit Ultimate Samsung S27A350H 27" LED Backlit HDMI Monitor Lenovo SK-8815 Corsair 850W Professional Series Gold 
CaseMouseAudio
Cooler Master 690 II Advanced Microsoft Basic Optical Mouse Plantronics GameCom 367 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i3-2125 Asus P8H77-I Intel HD 3000 Samsung Green 30nm 2x4GB MV-3V4G3D/US 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Crucial M4 128GB  Asus DRW-24B1ST Intel Stock Cooler Windows 8 Pro 
KeyboardPowerCaseOther
Microsoft Wireless Keyboard 800 Corsair Builder Series CX500V2 Lian Li PC-Q11B TrendNet TEW-684UB 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5-3210M Dell 04G65K Intel HD4000 Dell 2x4GB 1600MHz 
Hard DriveOS
Seagate/WD 1TB 5400RPM Windows 7 Home Premium 
  hide details  
Reply
post #92 of 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by funfortehfun View Post

AMD needs to increase the core to clock performances of their cores, not the speed. If I overclocked a Bulldozer processor to 4.5 GHz it still might not even overcome an i7 2600K processor at stock.
That is sort of obvious. Both companies are always trying to improve CPU performance always.

However, both companies have to balance thousands/millions of design variables and market needs... so just IPC increase is not a clear objective either. If a better path prediction improves performance by 5% but costs 30w power budget... is it worth it?
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
post #93 of 198
Can anyone put into simple terms why AMD's clock for clock speed is so far behind Intel's in as simple an answer as possible?
Betsy
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 750 @ 3.8ghz Gigabyte GA-P55-US3L Sapphire 5850 @ 920/1200 8gb Corsair Vengance Arctic White 1600mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
2x 250gb raid 0 Win 7 64bit LG Flatron 23" Razer Blackwidow 
PowerCaseMouseOther
OCZ 600W NZXT Phantom Gigabyte M6900 Razer Nostromo 
  hide details  
Reply
Betsy
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 750 @ 3.8ghz Gigabyte GA-P55-US3L Sapphire 5850 @ 920/1200 8gb Corsair Vengance Arctic White 1600mhz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
2x 250gb raid 0 Win 7 64bit LG Flatron 23" Razer Blackwidow 
PowerCaseMouseOther
OCZ 600W NZXT Phantom Gigabyte M6900 Razer Nostromo 
  hide details  
Reply
post #94 of 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieHo View Post

Then why did you say "The easiest way to see the perfomance per core"? ...because it is not. wink.gif

for me tongue.gif Otherwise i agree 100% with you.
 
Amd system
(11 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 965@3.8(missing 2 Pins lolz) Asus Crosshair V Sapphire 7970 ref. (1250/1900 @1.2/1.65) Kingston 8 GB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSKeyboard
WD Blue 1TB Corsair H60 (Push-Pull) Windows 7 Ultimate Razer BlackWidow Ultimate 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Coolermaster HAF 932 (red edition) Razer Imperator 2012(Mass effect) Razer Goliath 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel 3930k@4.5 Asus Rampage IV Extreme 2x vtx3d 7970 1100/900@1volt 2xSapphire 7970 1100/900@0.95volt 
CoolingCoolingCooling
Ek 7970 Ek supremacy 3x Alphacool monsta 360 
  hide details  
Reply
 
Amd system
(11 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 965@3.8(missing 2 Pins lolz) Asus Crosshair V Sapphire 7970 ref. (1250/1900 @1.2/1.65) Kingston 8 GB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSKeyboard
WD Blue 1TB Corsair H60 (Push-Pull) Windows 7 Ultimate Razer BlackWidow Ultimate 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Coolermaster HAF 932 (red edition) Razer Imperator 2012(Mass effect) Razer Goliath 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel 3930k@4.5 Asus Rampage IV Extreme 2x vtx3d 7970 1100/900@1volt 2xSapphire 7970 1100/900@0.95volt 
CoolingCoolingCooling
Ek 7970 Ek supremacy 3x Alphacool monsta 360 
  hide details  
Reply
post #95 of 198
Hopefully this will be a blast , and be a really good success.
Mint
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[AMD] FX 4100  [Gigabyte] GA-880GM-USB3 (Rev 3.1) [MSI] Radeon HD 6770  [Crucial] Ballistix tactical tracers (2x2GB) 16... 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
[Seagate] ST1000DM003 1TB (Storage) [SanDisk] 64GB SSD (Boot) [Coolermaster] Hyper TX3 Evo [Windows] 7 Professional x64 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
[LG] Flatron W2246 22" [Novatech] PowerStation 500W PSU [Fractal Design] Core 1000  [Gigabyte] M6800 Gamings Mouse 
Mouse PadAudio
[Ozone] Groundlevel S Gaming Mousemat [Gigabyte] Onboard Audio 
  hide details  
Reply
Mint
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[AMD] FX 4100  [Gigabyte] GA-880GM-USB3 (Rev 3.1) [MSI] Radeon HD 6770  [Crucial] Ballistix tactical tracers (2x2GB) 16... 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
[Seagate] ST1000DM003 1TB (Storage) [SanDisk] 64GB SSD (Boot) [Coolermaster] Hyper TX3 Evo [Windows] 7 Professional x64 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
[LG] Flatron W2246 22" [Novatech] PowerStation 500W PSU [Fractal Design] Core 1000  [Gigabyte] M6800 Gamings Mouse 
Mouse PadAudio
[Ozone] Groundlevel S Gaming Mousemat [Gigabyte] Onboard Audio 
  hide details  
Reply
post #96 of 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeardedJesus View Post

Can anyone put into simple terms why AMD's clock for clock speed is so far behind Intel's in as simple an answer as possible?

The answers are not simple. wink.gif

It has to do with latency, chip architecture, and path prediction.....
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
post #97 of 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeardedJesus View Post

Can anyone put into simple terms why AMD's clock for clock speed is so far behind Intel's in as simple an answer as possible?

Clock speed? Clock speed is pretty much irrelevant.

IPC is what matters or really IPS, but since bulldozer and sandy/ivy clock to pretty much the same it is really the IPC that differentiates the two. The reason bulldozer has such low IPC is probably because it is a brand new architecture and after it is refreshed it will become a bit more powerful. Or somthing like that.
Edited by icehotshot - 7/5/12 at 9:56am
SB goodness
(14 items)
 
Core 2 duo
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2500k @ 4.5ghz,1.392v GIGABYTE GA-P67A-UD4-B3 EVGA GTX 570 SC @ 955/2000 @ 1.113v with Antec ... 8gb Corsair Vengeance 1600 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
240gb Corsair Force Series 3 SSD CM Hyper 212+ Windows 7 64-bit PCP&C 750 Silencer (Quad Black) 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
CM 690 II Advanced Steelseries Ikari Steelseries SX 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Duo E6750 Asus P5n32-e SLI EVGA 8800gt superclocked @ 750/725 gaming/folding 2gb A-data ddr2 800 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
WD Raptor 10k 150gb Stock Win Xp 32 bit Corsair CX500 
Case
NZXT 
  hide details  
Reply
SB goodness
(14 items)
 
Core 2 duo
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2500k @ 4.5ghz,1.392v GIGABYTE GA-P67A-UD4-B3 EVGA GTX 570 SC @ 955/2000 @ 1.113v with Antec ... 8gb Corsair Vengeance 1600 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
240gb Corsair Force Series 3 SSD CM Hyper 212+ Windows 7 64-bit PCP&C 750 Silencer (Quad Black) 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
CM 690 II Advanced Steelseries Ikari Steelseries SX 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Duo E6750 Asus P5n32-e SLI EVGA 8800gt superclocked @ 750/725 gaming/folding 2gb A-data ddr2 800 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
WD Raptor 10k 150gb Stock Win Xp 32 bit Corsair CX500 
Case
NZXT 
  hide details  
Reply
post #98 of 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeardedJesus View Post

Can anyone put into simple terms why AMD's clock for clock speed is so far behind Intel's in as simple an answer as possible?

IPS the most important reason and then it goes more complex. I have read an article for bulldozer in depth that explained what was the real reason but i cant remember from where. Latency is another good problem for the bad result
 
Amd system
(11 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 965@3.8(missing 2 Pins lolz) Asus Crosshair V Sapphire 7970 ref. (1250/1900 @1.2/1.65) Kingston 8 GB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSKeyboard
WD Blue 1TB Corsair H60 (Push-Pull) Windows 7 Ultimate Razer BlackWidow Ultimate 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Coolermaster HAF 932 (red edition) Razer Imperator 2012(Mass effect) Razer Goliath 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel 3930k@4.5 Asus Rampage IV Extreme 2x vtx3d 7970 1100/900@1volt 2xSapphire 7970 1100/900@0.95volt 
CoolingCoolingCooling
Ek 7970 Ek supremacy 3x Alphacool monsta 360 
  hide details  
Reply
 
Amd system
(11 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 965@3.8(missing 2 Pins lolz) Asus Crosshair V Sapphire 7970 ref. (1250/1900 @1.2/1.65) Kingston 8 GB 
Hard DriveCoolingOSKeyboard
WD Blue 1TB Corsair H60 (Push-Pull) Windows 7 Ultimate Razer BlackWidow Ultimate 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Coolermaster HAF 932 (red edition) Razer Imperator 2012(Mass effect) Razer Goliath 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel 3930k@4.5 Asus Rampage IV Extreme 2x vtx3d 7970 1100/900@1volt 2xSapphire 7970 1100/900@0.95volt 
CoolingCoolingCooling
Ek 7970 Ek supremacy 3x Alphacool monsta 360 
  hide details  
Reply
post #99 of 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carniflex View Post

I still think that AMD's decision to call half a module a core is marketing talk similar if Intel would decide to market their i7's with 4 cores and 4 hyperthreads as 8 core chips.
It's not the same thing. An AMD module does contain two actual execution cores. A hyperthreaded Intel CPU does not. Intel is allowed to say their approach works nearly as well as AMD's in handling multiple threads. They cannot, however, make false claims about the number of cores just because their HT technology does a good job of simulating multiple cores.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arni90 View Post

AMD has already that beat with their A10-5700 at 65W thumb.gif
And yes, AMD will never beat Intel.
They've been farther behind than this, and come all the way back to beat Intel before. Before the K6 came out, they were selling the K5-133 (although they spuriously sold it as PR200) when Intel already had the P2-450. When Intel had the Pentium MMX 233, AMD's best was their 133 MHz 486. This is as big a lead as Intel's had in a while, but even now, AMD's nowhere near that far out of the game.
My PC
(15 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX-8350 Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 Radeon HD6670 8 GB Crucial 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Seagate Momentus XT 500GB, Hitachi 1 TB dual DVD-RW drives SilverStone Heligon HE01 Windows 7 x64 Home Premium 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell P1130 21" CRT IBM Model M Ultra LSX 750 Rosewill Challenger 
MouseAudio
Logitech Marble Mouse ASUS Xonar DG 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core2 Duo T7200 Mobility Radeon XPress 200 2GB Micron DDR2 Seagate Momentus XT 500GB 
Optical DriveOSAudio
stock DVD/CDR Windows XP Pro x64 Edition Realtek HD Audio 
  hide details  
Reply
My PC
(15 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX-8350 Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 Radeon HD6670 8 GB Crucial 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Seagate Momentus XT 500GB, Hitachi 1 TB dual DVD-RW drives SilverStone Heligon HE01 Windows 7 x64 Home Premium 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell P1130 21" CRT IBM Model M Ultra LSX 750 Rosewill Challenger 
MouseAudio
Logitech Marble Mouse ASUS Xonar DG 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core2 Duo T7200 Mobility Radeon XPress 200 2GB Micron DDR2 Seagate Momentus XT 500GB 
Optical DriveOSAudio
stock DVD/CDR Windows XP Pro x64 Edition Realtek HD Audio 
  hide details  
Reply
post #100 of 198
From reading articles and user submitted data on FX vs Phenom 2 IPC it seems that on average Phenom 2 is a good 20%+ faster so this 15% improvment people are stating still won't bring it up to Phenom 2 level.
Edited by Mr Frosty - 7/5/12 at 10:33am
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [FUD] AMD 8350 is a 4.0GHz eight-core