Quote:
Problem with reviews that bother doing Eyefinity is that they do 3x1 1080p, i.e., ~6 megapixels and, most importantly, they don't apply their brains and just throw something silly like x16 AA into the settings just bcos it's part of "ultra" in game X or Y. The main point of the x16 AA was to sell high end GFX cards before eyefinity/surround came around. Human vision system is physically limited to roughly one arc minute of angular resolution (i.e., anything higher than that and the cells in your eye you use for vision see more than one pixel simultaneously in the central area where they are packed the most dense) which translates roughly into 100 ppi at roughly few feet from the display.
In the case of Eyefinity arrays, even if you are using rather large displays and sitting relatively close max AA levels that make sense are around x2 or max up to x4 (if you are using 27'' at 1080p).
For example, I'm using 5x 23'' 1080p displays in portrait sitting ~75 cm from my displays and I really cant tell at a glance if I'm at x0 AA, x2 AA or x16 AA without looking at the settings (i.e, get someone else to set the AA level and try to guess by looking at the screen what level of AA, if any, is applied).
With the 1440p Koreans getting as low as 250 euros I would really expect the review sites to put in a little more effort into their reviews and at least do 3x 1440p in their reviews when they investigate higher end cards. All mid to high end cards on the market today can do 3x 1440p Eyefinity/Surround.















