Quote:
Originally Posted by andrews2547 

GT5 (pre-rendered):

Real life

Project C.A.R.S (gameplay):

Real life:

I'm not saying GT5 looks horrible because for a console game it doesn't even for PC games it's not that bad visually. PC games are still a lot better visually than the visuals of GT5 (especially lighting and shadows) but you can't really compare the visuals of a console game to the visuals of a PC game.


GT5 (pre-rendered):

Real life

Project C.A.R.S (gameplay):

Real life:

I'm not saying GT5 looks horrible because for a console game it doesn't even for PC games it's not that bad visually. PC games are still a lot better visually than the visuals of GT5 (especially lighting and shadows) but you can't really compare the visuals of a console game to the visuals of a PC game.
That GTR is rendered in real time.
As are the cars in photomode (though it maxes the PS3 far beyond it's capabilities)
PS3 GT5 F458

Real life

Pretty Good for a game that had it's inception in 2005-6 running on hardware that is more than 7 years old, even older if you count the CPU. And make that pumping 720p on 256mb ram.
The real deal will be GT6.
But i'll buy C.A.R.S anyway, im a car racing freak








. I agree the developers did awesome job optimizing this emulator, now 60 fps is very attainable considering you own a decent PC.


