Multi-input monitors at extreme resolutions?

I had a Gateway XHD3000 a few years ago, but I had issues with how hot it became (and the heat output into my room), so I gave it to my older brother who used it as an office monitor, and he told me it died about 3 months ago. I liked how I could connect my game consoles to it in addition to using it as my computer monitor, though. Now I'm wondering what current extreme-resolution (i.e. 2560x1440 or higher) monitors (including less-publicized Korean brands) are usable for this.
The following are models I'm aware of:

Dell U2711 - DP, 2xDVI, HDMI, D-Sub, Component, Composite
Dell 3008WFP - DP, 2xDVI, HDMI, D-Sub, Component, S-Video, Composite
Dell U3011 - DP, 2xDVI, 2xHDMI, D-Sub, Component
CrossOver 2720MDP - DP, DVI, 2xHDMI, D-Sub, Component
CrossOver 3020MDP - DP, DVI, 2xHDMI, D-Sub, Component
Yamakasi Catleap Q270 Multi - DVI, HDMI, D-Sub

I've seen opinions from some people that the anti-glare coating on the dell ultrasharps is awful, and I've noticed that they have high power consumption with their CCFL backlights (which would mean a lot of heat output).
The CrossOver 2720MDP looks very weak in the contrast ratio department in this review, even compared to other IPS panels:
http://www.playwares.com/xe/22822357
The Yamakasi would need some kind of adapter or a capture card in my computer to handle consoles with component output.

Are there any other monitors that fit the criteria (I don't insist on IPS; I'm willing to consider VA or even TN if there are any at these resolutions), and are there other drawbacks to these monitors that users have noticed?

I haven't ruled out the U2711, I just have a little trouble justifying the price - it runs for around 2 to 3 times the price of a Samsung P2770HD for only 1.77 times the pixels. That's why I'm trying to find out about alternatives. I know the U2711 is IPS while the P2770HD is TN, but I'm colorblind (deuteranopia if you want to be specific), so the improved color accuracy isn't a significant advantage for me.

The revised CrossOver 2720mdp looks like it would be better, but I'd have to worry whether the seller I got it from was correct about having the revised version.
The S27A850D doesn't even have HDMI, but the semi-glossy coating looks good in those subpixel pictures, so if I decide to go back to having a separate TV for my consoles, it would be a strong choice.
The S27B970D only has DP, DVI, and HDMI; the lack of analog inputs would make it difficult to connect older consoles, and as far as I can tell, it has no headphone jack, so getting sound from hdmi source to external speakers (instead of the monitor's built-in speakers) would be tricky.

A new Dell 30 incher coming out intrigues me, though. Do you have any preview details, like panel type or which inputs will still be included?

Also, I've seen subpixel comparisons like that before, but I'm not convinced that the blurriness evident in the zoomed subpixels would translate into issues with reading text on the monitor. If you can find me photos of text being shown on such a monitor that demonstrate the issue, I'd be more inclined to believe it.

For SNES and N64, I agree, and I'm thinking about using an emulator for my games for those systems, but they'd require composite (or s-video, or even SCART) anyway, not component. I've played GameCube games over component cables on the XHD3000, and they looked okay. My Wii should be okay as well.
I was concerned about the X360, since the previous RCA adapter I had also had component video, but blocked the hdmi output. However, now that I look, I see there are some X360 cables that only carry the audio and leave room for hdmi for the video. For PS3, the component adapter doesn't interfere with other ports.
I've seen that before. That's not just the anti-glare coating being removed, but the protective plastic sheet that the anti-glare coating was applied to, and it leaves the front polarizer exposed. If I end up getting the U2711 and find I can't stand the AG coating, I think I'd try the clear packaging tape trick first. See this post:
http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1036248628&postcount=13
Now that I look at that post again, I notice it has a text picture that is cause for doubting that the anti-glare is that bad for text, though I'll admit it isn't using subpixel font smoothing, which might be more affected.