Hey all -
Along with my first IT / SysAdmin job, I finally have the time, resources, and ability to make my first foray into UNIX structures. I'm familiar with only a few commands ( I mean... a few, fdisk, sudo make-me-a-sammich, etc). To that end, I'm looking for a stripped down, unbloated UNIX OS to start studying. My Brother has long been an advocated of FreeBSD - but I have my reservations. A friend of mine recommends Arch, but there are a few issues there as well. And then there may be some others that I have not yet seen. I'm not enamored by going into super mainstream Linux like Fedora or Ubuntu, because I want to learn by being tossed headfirst into CLI and ground-up a machine, not have to reverse engineer a complex, existing system.
Now, this is coming from a guy who's never used UNIX, so I may be wrong, but here are my current perceptions:
FreeBSD:
- "Purist" Variant - Least Associated with "Linux," but accordingly small desktop userbase.
- Lags behind Linux in Driver Support for Mainstream Hardware
- Little to No Support for Non-Mainstream Hardware
- Not as many conveniences as Linux (My Brother's FreeBSD can't auto-mount USB keys....)
- "Fringe" or "Niche," may not provide desired relevancy to my IT career other than in the Server industry.
ArchLinux:
- Among the most well documented Linux Versions out there.
- Relatively user friendly (however, the people on the forums are dicks)
- Closest to BSD in its "Purity" while still being Linux.
- Doesn't come with a lot of built in bloat - heavy use of pacman necessary
Along with my first IT / SysAdmin job, I finally have the time, resources, and ability to make my first foray into UNIX structures. I'm familiar with only a few commands ( I mean... a few, fdisk, sudo make-me-a-sammich, etc). To that end, I'm looking for a stripped down, unbloated UNIX OS to start studying. My Brother has long been an advocated of FreeBSD - but I have my reservations. A friend of mine recommends Arch, but there are a few issues there as well. And then there may be some others that I have not yet seen. I'm not enamored by going into super mainstream Linux like Fedora or Ubuntu, because I want to learn by being tossed headfirst into CLI and ground-up a machine, not have to reverse engineer a complex, existing system.
Now, this is coming from a guy who's never used UNIX, so I may be wrong, but here are my current perceptions:
FreeBSD:
- "Purist" Variant - Least Associated with "Linux," but accordingly small desktop userbase.
- Lags behind Linux in Driver Support for Mainstream Hardware
- Little to No Support for Non-Mainstream Hardware
- Not as many conveniences as Linux (My Brother's FreeBSD can't auto-mount USB keys....)
- "Fringe" or "Niche," may not provide desired relevancy to my IT career other than in the Server industry.
ArchLinux:
- Among the most well documented Linux Versions out there.
- Relatively user friendly (however, the people on the forums are dicks)
- Closest to BSD in its "Purity" while still being Linux.
- Doesn't come with a lot of built in bloat - heavy use of pacman necessary











(debian stable user here) even testing is outdated (or stabler 


