Quote:
Originally Posted by klaxian 
The S100 is a pro level P&S if there is such a thing. It's the best P&S I've used by far. The sensor and processor are a completely new generation from the S95 so it's a good time to buy. Even when the S105 comes out some day, it will likely use the same CPU and sensor as the S100 if Canon follows its previous pattern. Unfortunately, it is also quite expensive for a P&S. If you're not going to be taking advantage of the RAW capability and manual modes like M, Tv, and Av, you might be better off with one of Canon's lower end P&S cameras. Don't get hung up on GPS. You can always tag your photos later. In addition, GPS takes a lot of power from the camera and P&S's don't have large batteries to begin with. I typically turn GPS off on the S100 to conserve power.

The S100 is a pro level P&S if there is such a thing. It's the best P&S I've used by far. The sensor and processor are a completely new generation from the S95 so it's a good time to buy. Even when the S105 comes out some day, it will likely use the same CPU and sensor as the S100 if Canon follows its previous pattern. Unfortunately, it is also quite expensive for a P&S. If you're not going to be taking advantage of the RAW capability and manual modes like M, Tv, and Av, you might be better off with one of Canon's lower end P&S cameras. Don't get hung up on GPS. You can always tag your photos later. In addition, GPS takes a lot of power from the camera and P&S's don't have large batteries to begin with. I typically turn GPS off on the S100 to conserve power.
I will defiantly be using the camera to shoot RAW and always using manual modes. I've looked it up and it really is between the two I have mentioned. The GPS feature isn't something I /need/ but its just nice to have there automatically. The only thing really stopping me from this right now is the F./5.9 aperture when fully zoomed, I can see situations where this might be an issue.








