Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Mice › LOD G400 without prediction
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

LOD G400 without prediction - Page 2

post #11 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by thuNDa View Post

i get over 4 m/s in enotus mousetest at 800dpi with tape applied, what do you want more?

Nothing more rather less (the tape) tongue.gif. I get my needed performance and its fine if you get what you want. My point is that the led-trick is a cleaner solution (in my case also functionable). Since it doesnt seem essential rather as a matter of taste, at this point: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZh_dfuqQUo#t=0m14s biggrin.gif
post #12 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbringer View Post

Nothing more rather less (the tape) tongue.gif. I get my needed performance and its fine if you get what you want. My point is that the led-trick is a cleaner solution (in my case also functionable). Since it doesnt seem essential rather as a matter of taste, at this point: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZh_dfuqQUo#t=0m14s biggrin.gif

in my experience changing the LED affects the max tracking way more than using the tape-trick.
like using a red LED in the DA 3G rev3 / 3.5G / abyssus reduces the max tracking extremely, while it's usable with da 3g rev2 the max tracking gets reduced anyways.
So to what would you change the red-LED of the G400 to, to keep the maxtracking speed(which is still only a bit over 4m/s even without tape) and get the LOD lower?
post #13 of 16
^ Like I said earlier, it depends on circuit design and resistors.

You could experiment around more with different types or brands of LEDs.
post #14 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by thuNDa View Post

in my experience changing the LED affects the max tracking way more than using the tape-trick.
like using a red LED in the DA 3G rev3 / 3.5G / abyssus reduces the max tracking extremely, while it's usable with da 3g rev2 the max tracking gets reduced anyways.
So to what would you change the red-LED of the G400 to, to keep the maxtracking speed(which is still only a bit over 4m/s even without tape) and get the LOD lower?

No! The g400 i was talking about has a original g400 led, its untouched - no ledswap or any other tricks/technics applied. My post (last page second post) refers to the "native" g400 state. This was actually the reason why i have posted at all, before that i have read only about high lod (g400) So i was a bit surprised. Sofar i have changed led (in order to reduce the lod) on the krait and abyssus. For example the abyssus with a microsoft wmo led -> no lod (literally)! Where the performance remains (enotus at 400 setting and aby@450 dpi gives 4.5m/s if you want numbers.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skylit View Post

^ Like I said earlier, it depends on circuit design and resistors.
You could experiment around more with different types or brands of LEDs.

Exactly!
post #15 of 16
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderbringer View Post

No! The g400 i was talking about has a original g400 led, its untouched - no ledswap or any other tricks/technics applied. My post (last page second post) refers to the "native" g400 state. This was actually the reason why i have posted at all, before that i have read only about high lod (g400) So i was a bit surprised. Sofar i have changed led (in order to reduce the lod) on the krait and abyssus. For example the abyssus with a microsoft wmo led -> no lod (literally)! Where the performance remains (enotus at 400 setting and aby@450 dpi gives 4.5m/s if you want numbers.)
Exactly!
Hey


I have a broken intelliexplorer 3.0, are u saying if I change the LED on my Deathadder 3.5g with that LED I'm going to get less lod at the cost of 0 performance lost ?
post #16 of 16
Depends. Abyssus has a different electrical engineering design.
Edited by Skylit - 7/28/12 at 10:34am
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Mice
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Mice › LOD G400 without prediction