The whole study reeks of bias, so I don't find it especially compelling. They're constantly bandying around loaded words and making judgements about the results being good or bad. If they were truly interested in examining the human condition they would present their findings without assigning judgmental values to the different effects. No, after thinking about this for a night I find myself viewing this study as something they went into with a goal in mind and got the results they were searching for.
Maby it's just this articles interpretation, but if the study itself has the same tone I don't really think I'd trust their methology.
Maby it's just this articles interpretation, but if the study itself has the same tone I don't really think I'd trust their methology.













.