Quote:
Originally Posted by
mcochran1998 
Um this looks like it could be a bigger pain than water
Bigger pain than having water dripping all over your electronics?
Quote:
I'm just imagining this thing in my case & I'm laughing at the absurdity. I have a big enough cpu cooler as it is, any gpu solution would have to be a lot smaller than this to work for me. How many people would this be a viable option to, and out of those people who would actually want it at the price they want?
Air-cooling enthusiasts would probably ask the same thing about people like you who like having liquids around your electronics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcochran1998
I'm asking how many people would actually pay for this vs another gpu cooling solution? Is it really that much better than the other non-reference designs we've seen? I've always perceived it that there's a limit with air cooling & I'm wondering is this really that much better, considering how huge this thing is. I know I couldn't use this thing if I wanted, how many others are in my boat?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcochran1998
If i was looking for the best performing solution hard or not it's watercooling of some kind. If I'm looking for an alternative for water that isn't noisy is this the best one out there. If it really does offer the best performance without being noisy I can see that for those that could actually use this it would be attractive.
Don't know if you even considered, but maybe some people just don't like having water near their expensive electronics like you do for obvious reasons. Cheaper or not, water-cooling is still more risky than having a huge hunk of metal in your computer.

You seem to have a problem with people who want better air-cooling while you think there's a limit. As long as there's still cool air around this planet, there is no limit.