Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tankster399 
Honestly xp was a good os 98,xp,7 same only os worth mentioning. Me was a Terrible os crashing all time and vista was a memory eater. 8 I only used for about 10 mins worst crap ever installing Debian and building a server was eaSier than using windows 8 hate metro so much. Enough ranting for now.
This silly argument again. MS OSes usually dont release well.
95 had issues than 98 had issues until SE was released
ME was trash ill give you that
NT 4.0 had issues until SP1
WIn 2000 was fairly great from the get go but SP 1 was a hell of an improvement
XP was horrible until SP1, and was great after SP3 (For its time)
Vista was "horrible" until SP1 because OEMs tried to run it on underpowered hardware
Windows 7 was pretty great from the get go (with about the same performance and system requirements of Vista)
Windows 8 - Whole new UI - Everyone is acting like the world ended. (but it performes better than 7 and vista on the same hardware)
An why would anyone use XP over Vista, 7 or 8? It is far mor insecure, is not designed to take advantage of newer hardware
I used windows 8. And I really didnt really care for metro untill i got used to it, but i didnt have any issues using it and i did notice a lot of improvements in the speed of the machine. Not to mention I hardly see metro as I work from the desktop 99.9% of the time. And i have to say, I'm sorry but trying a new UI for 10 minutes is not giving it a chance, all you are doing is giving yourself fuel to hate something because it is different.