Originally Posted by opi
WW2 is def way over done. I believe most gamers feel this way and so do the game developers. What more could there be that hasn't been done for the umpteenth time? The only thing I can think of is a game using the experimental weapons of WW2 but then idk if you could really call it a true WW2 game. I wouldn't call black ops a Vietnam game. It had like 1 or 2 jungle maps and it was more a cold war type of game. BFBC2 Vietnam is a DLC. I am talking about a full blown game that is actually very well done. Much like BFV but alot better obviously. BFV was great but their is so much they could of improved on. Anyone remember the helicopter circle of death?
Expecting them to create an improved and updated version of classic BF games is a pipe dream. I'd love it, and it should
be done, but it won't
be. Not as long as EA calls the shots and is trying to compete with CoD.
If they made a BF Vietnam 2, I can promise
you that it will be nothing but a bunch of rambos derping around in the bushes and killing each-other with hyper-ballistic-exploding-napalm-knives and deathstreak airstrikes, all with a nice muddy grey-blue "realism" filter and stupidly excessive bloom to attempt to overcome the stupid grey-blue filter and add back some small level of contrast.Edited by Zero4549 - 8/19/12 at 3:28pm