There are in reverse chronological order, very bad news across the board for Samsung so far:
3:57:50 PM PDT
No across the board. Not a single one proven invalid by Samsung.
3:57:33 PM PDT
381 Not proven invalid.
3:57:16 PM PDT
Invalidity. Another biggie.
3:57:06 PM PDT
for all but D'087 and D'889
3:56:41 PM PDT
for 381, 915, 163
3:56:23 PM PDT
SEC: Yes for all but
D'087 and D'889
3:56:00 PM PDTSorry, last question was whether Samsung should have known. This next one is willfulness.
3:54:58 PM PDT
for S 4G, Vibrant. No for S2 ATT, S2 Epic 4G Touch, S2 Skyrocket, Infuse 4G.
3:54:36 PM PDT
for Fascinate, S 4G, S2 ATT, S2 Tmobile, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, Showcase, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Vibrant
3:54:06 PM PDT
Question 9 — was Samsung willful in its infringement? Big one here for damages.
Originally Posted by Raven Dizzle
Tell me, what exactly is similar about these other than the fact that they uh..both have screens and use the color black?
Four columns of evenly spaced icons, both have bars at the top of the screen. Dots used to designate multiple pages, the current page dot being highlighted.
There's plenty of similarity, the issue is whether little crap like that should be able to be patented or not. I don't think so, it stifles innovation.Edited by lordikon - 8/24/12 at 3:58pm