Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint
Samsung has systematically copied Apple’s innovative technology and products,
features, and designs, and has deluged markets with infringing devices in an effort to usurp
market share from Apple. Instead of pursuing independent product development, Samsung
slavishly copied Apple’s innovative technology, with its elegant and distinctive user interfaces
product design, in violation of Apple’s valuable intellectual property rights.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint
Honorable Lucy H. Koh on July 30, 2012 (hereinafter the “Earlier Case”).
Honorable

But this also says this was sent to the courts in July or June...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint
Venue is proper within this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and (c) because
Samsung transacts business within this District and offers for sale in this District products that
infringe the Apple patents. In addition, venue is proper because Apple’s principal place of
business is in this District and Apple suffered harm in this District.
No that's cos you want Lucy Koh...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document261 Filed08/31/12 Page4 of 15
Wait a sec I thought you filed BEFORE the other case finished Apple?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint
Moreover, a substantial part
of the events giving rise to the claims occurred in this District.
Umm... not really.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint
Apple has protected its innovative designs and cutting-edge technologies
Innovative designs? Maybe. Cutting-edge technology? Hella no.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint
Rather than innovate and develop its own technology and a unique Samsung style
for its smart phone and tablet computer products, Samsung has chosen to copy Apple’s
technology, user interface, and innovative style in its phone, media player, and tablet computer
products.
Hmm... so making a bigger screen wasn't Samsung's idea... right? And neither was a 7inch tablet... right? And what about rounded corners, with the evidence Samsung couldn't provide, or its designer be at the case... Hmm... how weird...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint
Samsung continues to choose to infringe Apple’s patent rights through the design
and promotion of its mobile phones, tablet computers, and media players to trade upon the
goodwill that Apple has developed in connection with its Apple family of mobile products.
lolwut? They have never said some crap like resolutionary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint
21. Apple is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that Samsung has gained profits by virtue of its infringement of the ’647 Patent.
Products sell better with an operating system

Note: that crap carries on with all the rest of the patents, so I'm gonna skip that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint
A judgment that each of Apple’s asserted patents is valid and enforceable;
99% of Apple's patents are not valid

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint
A judgment awarding Apple all of Samsung’s profits,
Are Apple on DAMN CRACK?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint
Actual damages suffered by Apple
None.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint
A judgment that this is an exceptional case and an award to Apple of its costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred
Not like they can't afford it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint
Pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Apple hereby demands
trial by jury on all issues raised by the Complaint.
Demands? Jeez, you can;t just call in your Apple-lovers... but then again that's better for Samsung than damn Lucy Koh.
My don't-know-much-about-lawyer-talk overview of this document.
Edited by 3930K - 9/1/12 at 2:35am