Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Technology and Science News › [CNBC] Apple targets more Samsung products in patent suit; Galaxy SIII
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[CNBC] Apple targets more Samsung products in patent suit; Galaxy SIII - Page 2  

post #11 of 265
If anyone thinks these types of patents are exclusive to Apple then you should have a read over here: http://www.latestpatents.com/category/samsung/. You can have a look at what Samsung's patenting, and on the right side of the page you can look at the latest patents from Google and other companies. Lots of them are just as vague as they are here.
post #12 of 265

Doesn't this invalidate a lot of claims of Apple patent 8074172 on word completion? It is absolutely ridiculous that Apple is suing for such a basic function of modern computing.

http://www.google.com/patents/US8074172
post #13 of 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by steelbom View Post

If anyone thinks these types of patents are exclusive to Apple then you should have a read over here: http://www.latestpatents.com/category/samsung/. You can have a look at what Samsung's patenting, and on the right side of the page you can look at the latest patents from Google and other companies. Lots of them are just as vague as they are here.
The patent office is filled with them. That is definitely a big problem.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500K MSI P67A-G43 MSI GTX 460 Cyclone Ripjaws X 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
Vertex 2 WD Green ASUS Windows 7 
PowerCase
Antec TruePower New 750 HAF 922 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500K MSI P67A-G43 MSI GTX 460 Cyclone Ripjaws X 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
Vertex 2 WD Green ASUS Windows 7 
PowerCase
Antec TruePower New 750 HAF 922 
  hide details  
post #14 of 265
The 172 patent is ridiculous, how did they get a patent on predictive text?
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 760 @ stock will update when I get home EVGA GTX 470 @ stock 4GB G-Skill DDR3 
OSKeyboardMouse
Windows 7 Saitek Eclipse (Blue) Roccat Kone (now broken) 
  hide details  
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 760 @ stock will update when I get home EVGA GTX 470 @ stock 4GB G-Skill DDR3 
OSKeyboardMouse
Windows 7 Saitek Eclipse (Blue) Roccat Kone (now broken) 
  hide details  
post #15 of 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint 
Samsung has systematically copied Apple’s innovative technology and products,
features, and designs, and has deluged markets with infringing devices in an effort to usurp
market share from Apple. Instead of pursuing independent product development, Samsung
slavishly copied Apple’s innovative technology, with its elegant and distinctive user interfaces
product design, in violation of Apple’s valuable intellectual property rights.
lachen.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint 
Honorable Lucy H. Koh on July 30, 2012 (hereinafter the “Earlier Case”).
Honorable lachen.gif
But this also says this was sent to the courts in July or June...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint 
Venue is proper within this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and (c) because
Samsung transacts business within this District and offers for sale in this District products that
infringe the Apple patents. In addition, venue is proper because Apple’s principal place of
business is in this District and Apple suffered harm in this District.
No that's cos you want Lucy Koh...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint 
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document261 Filed08/31/12 Page4 of 15
Wait a sec I thought you filed BEFORE the other case finished Apple? confused.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint 
Moreover, a substantial part
of the events giving rise to the claims occurred in this District.
Umm... not really.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint 
Apple has protected its innovative designs and cutting-edge technologies
Innovative designs? Maybe. Cutting-edge technology? Hella no.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint 
Rather than innovate and develop its own technology and a unique Samsung style
for its smart phone and tablet computer products, Samsung has chosen to copy Apple’s
technology, user interface, and innovative style in its phone, media player, and tablet computer
products.
Hmm... so making a bigger screen wasn't Samsung's idea... right? And neither was a 7inch tablet... right? And what about rounded corners, with the evidence Samsung couldn't provide, or its designer be at the case... Hmm... how weird... poke.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint 
Samsung continues to choose to infringe Apple’s patent rights through the design
and promotion of its mobile phones, tablet computers, and media players to trade upon the
goodwill that Apple has developed in connection with its Apple family of mobile products.
lolwut? They have never said some crap like resolutionary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint 
21. Apple is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that Samsung has gained profits by virtue of its infringement of the ’647 Patent.
Products sell better with an operating system lachen.gif
Note: that crap carries on with all the rest of the patents, so I'm gonna skip that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint 
A judgment that each of Apple’s asserted patents is valid and enforceable;
99% of Apple's patents are not valid lachen.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint 
A judgment awarding Apple all of Samsung’s profits,
Are Apple on DAMN CRACK?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint 
Actual damages suffered by Apple
None.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint 
A judgment that this is an exceptional case and an award to Apple of its costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred
Not like they can't afford it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint 
Pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Apple hereby demands
trial by jury on all issues raised by the Complaint.
Demands? Jeez, you can;t just call in your Apple-lovers... but then again that's better for Samsung than damn Lucy Koh.

My don't-know-much-about-lawyer-talk overview of this document.
Edited by 3930K - 9/1/12 at 2:35am
post #16 of 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3930K View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amended Complaint 
Specifically, Samsung has imported into, offered for sale, or sold in the United States at least the following products, each of which infringes Apple’s patent rights: the Galaxy S III, Galaxy S III – Verizon, Galaxy Note, Galaxy S II Skyrocket, Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch, Galaxy S II, Galaxy S II - T-Mobile, Galaxy S II - AT&T, Galaxy Nexus, Illusion, Captivate Glide, Exhibit II 4G, Stratosphere, Transform Ultra, Admire, Conquer 4G, and Dart smartphones, the Galaxy Player 4.0 and Galaxy Player 5.0 media players, and the Galaxy Note 10.1, Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus and Galaxy Tab 8.9 tablets.
I've bolded the interesting ones.
First 3 look nothing like Crapple producs due to hella bigger screen (AND S-Pen), the G-Nex is already unbanned, iPods don't have 4 or 5 inch screens, G-Note 10.1 looks nothing like the iPad, and no-one could confuse 7 or 8.9 inch tablets wit an iPad.
Unless I missed it this law suit doesn't have anything to do with looking like an iPhone. All the claims have nothing to do with trade dress.
post #17 of 265
You're right. I'll delete that bit. But that's still a very long list of valid points.
post #18 of 265
I never like apple but now i wish that apple goes to hell along with their legal team.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 950 @ 4.63ghz - 1.47v HT off X58 SLI Classified EVGA GTX680 SC 2gb 1243/7008 Patriot Memory 6GB tri channel @ 1764 mhz 1.75v 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
2TB 7200rpm WD cheap DVD Swiftech Apogee XT. Swiftech MCP 655 Pump and ... win 7 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
acer 24" 1920X1080 x3 razer black widow ultimate Corsair 850W HAF932-AMD 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Logitech G9x razer corsair vengeance 1500 Thrustmasters T500rs, Fanatec CSR elite pedals ... 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 950 @ 4.63ghz - 1.47v HT off X58 SLI Classified EVGA GTX680 SC 2gb 1243/7008 Patriot Memory 6GB tri channel @ 1764 mhz 1.75v 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
2TB 7200rpm WD cheap DVD Swiftech Apogee XT. Swiftech MCP 655 Pump and ... win 7 64bit 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
acer 24" 1920X1080 x3 razer black widow ultimate Corsair 850W HAF932-AMD 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Logitech G9x razer corsair vengeance 1500 Thrustmasters T500rs, Fanatec CSR elite pedals ... 
  hide details  
post #19 of 265
I'm going to laugh when all the manufacturers for Apple (including Samsung) just stop selling to them after getting a lot of their products banned that were big money makers.

Remember when Intel/Nvidia was teamed up a bit and some sort of lawsuit happened.... Nvidia got punished that's for sure
     
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Core i7 2600K Asus Maximus IV Extreme AMD Radeon 7970 AMD Radeon 7970 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
16gb Gskill 1866mhz Vertex 3 240gb. 1TB Seagate 7200. 160gb WD 7200. LG 24x DVD XSPC Raystorm, MCP655, Frozen-Q Tvirus, RS360mm... 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 24'' 1080p by Asus Razer Blackwidow Ultimate Corsair 1000watt HX Modular 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Corsair 800D Razer Mamba Razer Ironclad Razer Megalodon's  
  hide details  
     
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Core i7 2600K Asus Maximus IV Extreme AMD Radeon 7970 AMD Radeon 7970 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
16gb Gskill 1866mhz Vertex 3 240gb. 1TB Seagate 7200. 160gb WD 7200. LG 24x DVD XSPC Raystorm, MCP655, Frozen-Q Tvirus, RS360mm... 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 24'' 1080p by Asus Razer Blackwidow Ultimate Corsair 1000watt HX Modular 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Corsair 800D Razer Mamba Razer Ironclad Razer Megalodon's  
  hide details  
post #20 of 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by steelbom View Post

Unless I missed it this law suit doesn't have anything to do with looking like an iPhone. All the claims have nothing to do with trade dress.

so they're taking them to court over their implementation of Android....which is touchwiz, which isn't exclusive to the GS3, so how can they specify the GS3? How can the software violations be cause to ban a device when the software can be removed??!?!?!?!
mitx
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 3570K 4.6ghz 1.2v ASRock Z77E-ITX Sapphire Vapor-X 7950 1200/1500 Samsung 'Magic' Ram 2x4gb 1866mhz 9-9-9-26 1.35v 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 840 Pro 256gb Western Digital WD15EARX Silverstone NT06-Pro Windows 7 x64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
ASUS 21.5'' 1080p LED-IPS Logitech G710+ Silverstone SG08 600W PSU Silverstone SG08B 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech G700 SteelSeries SX Creative Headset 
  hide details  
mitx
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 3570K 4.6ghz 1.2v ASRock Z77E-ITX Sapphire Vapor-X 7950 1200/1500 Samsung 'Magic' Ram 2x4gb 1866mhz 9-9-9-26 1.35v 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 840 Pro 256gb Western Digital WD15EARX Silverstone NT06-Pro Windows 7 x64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
ASUS 21.5'' 1080p LED-IPS Logitech G710+ Silverstone SG08 600W PSU Silverstone SG08B 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech G700 SteelSeries SX Creative Headset 
  hide details  
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Technology and Science News
This thread is locked  
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Technology and Science News › [CNBC] Apple targets more Samsung products in patent suit; Galaxy SIII