Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Mice › Deathadder Q
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Deathadder Q

post #1 of 7
Thread Starter 
Ive got the EC1 Evo and its not as accurate as my IE 3.0 but it has higher perfect control which the IE suck at. i use 500 hz and 450 dpi is the deathadder more accurate at this setting than the ec1 evo?. i heard it has soft clicks is this true cause im tired of the hard clicks on the evo its fine in games like counter strike but on cod 4 its impossible to click super fast.


also if i do buy one should i go with the black edition or regular? ive heard the black edition is like holding an ice cube by random people even though its supposed to be the opposite. i have kind of dry hands but it shifts alot.
post #2 of 7
Yeah, as far as Zowie Gear EC's shape-fan As I'm (as a 3.0A long-time), precision is just not as good as DeathAdders, I've notice and wrote about it here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by avinin1 View Post

after using the ec1 evo for long time and back to the DeathAdder I have, I realized that custom lens very effected the precision.
The EC1 Evo is has precise cursor/movements, its just, when you using a DeathAdder you can feel that the precision is better.
Both shape are for Plam, I believe that EC's can be more easily being held as Claw though
MouseWheel w/ encoder is better on the DeathAdder in term of overall feel, both performs the same and the EC's last longer in my experiences.
Main switchs are stiffer on the EC's, Wheel is stiffer for press - I like it more that way.
Teflon's feets are definitely better on the EC's since its bigger, thicker and technically controller
Both responses well on 1000hz, EC's not as stable as 500hz as on DeathAdder
Both technically suitable for high and medium sensitivity players, DeathAdder is a safe choice for low sens, EC's may not for some OCNoobs that wants 999m/s in thier mice ("only 2.7 @ 500hz".)
gl hf




I would say that the Black Edition is safe choice fi you tend to have sweaty hands or typical greasy
post #3 of 7
Thread Starter 
I like EC shape more than the 3.0... the 3-0 is kinda too long and curves to the left... does the DA do this aswell? which version represents the black ec1 in terms of the coating?
post #4 of 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by rattleheadmegadeth View Post

I like EC shape more than the 3.0... the 3-0 is kinda too long and curves to the left... does the DA do this aswell? which version represents the black ec1 in terms of the coating?
The DeathAdder left side is more like | but in the front is /
while the ECs are more /

I would say the Black edition one since its all-coated (just as EC1 Evo)
post #5 of 7
Thread Starter 
so the materials are just the same? i had problems picking the ec1 up for like a month when it was new but not so much anymore... which is gripper out of the ec1 black and DA black?
post #6 of 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by rattleheadmegadeth View Post

so the materials are just the same? i had problems picking the ec1 up for like a month when it was new but not so much anymore... which is gripper out of the ec1 black and DA black?
Thats a good question, I would like to know too.
I have only the 3500 version of the DeathAdder, Haven't experienced with the BE, sorry

but..size comparisons might help too:
post #7 of 7
Thread Starter 
Thanks.. i looked up the size on both mice and they are both exacly the same they only differ on half a milimeter in height. is the DA closer to an EC1 or IME 3.0? Not sure if ill get it if its exacly as the 3.0.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Mice
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Mice › Deathadder Q