Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › AMD 65nm Product Plans Unveiled
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

AMD 65nm Product Plans Unveiled

post #1 of 19
Thread Starter 
Quote:
AMD unleashes 65nm beginning in December

AMD’s long awaited 65nm Brisbane core products are just around the corner. DailyTech previously reported that Brisbane is expected to launch in December. AMD’s latest roadmap shows Brisbane 65nm products will arrive as scheduled. Brisbane will be AMD’s first 65nm core and is expected to launch with four parts. The four 65nm Brisbane core based products include the Athlon 64 X2 5000+, 4800+, 4400+ and 3800+. All four models will have 2x512KB of L2 cache and a 65W TDP rating.

Two additional products will switch over to the Brisbane 65nm core in Q2’2007. This includes the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and 5600+. The Athlon 64 X2 5600+ will be clocked at 2.8 GHz with a 2x512KB L2 cache configuration. Unlike the lower Brisbane products it will have a 76W TDP rating. AMD’s Brisbane based Athlon 64 X2 5200+ will differ from the current Windsor offering. Instead of the 2.6 GHz clock speed and 2x1MB L2 cache configuration of the Windsor based Athlon 64 X2 5200+, the Brisbane based Athlon 64 X2 5200+ will have a 2x512KB L2 cache configuration and 2.7 GHz clock speed. The Brisbane Athlon 64 X2 5200+ also has a 65W TDP like other Brisbane products.

Also arriving in Q2’2007 is energy efficient Brisbane based products. These Energy Efficient processors will have a 35W TDP and be available in Athlon 64 X2 4200+, 4000+ and new 3800+ models. Joining the energy efficient product lineup in Q3’2007 will be the Athlon 64 X2 4400+. The energy efficient Athlon 64 X2 4400+ carries the same 35W TDP as the other low power Brisbane products.

AMD’s dual-core product lineup isn’t the only lineup switching over to 65nm. Single-core Athlon 64 products based on the 65nm Lima core will arrive in January 2007. Two initial single-core Lima products will be introduced. These products are the Athlon 64 3800+ and Athlon 64 3500+. Joining the 65nm single-core party in Q2’2007 is the Athlon 64 4000+. All single-core Lima based products carry a 45W TDP rating and have 512KB of L2 cache.

Not to be left out of the 65nm transitions is the Sempron product lineup. In Q2’2007 AMD will release four 65nm Sparta based Sempron products. The Sempron Sparta based lineup includes the 3800+, 3600+, 3500+ and 3400+ clocked at 2.2 GHz, 2.0 GHz, and 1.8 GHz respectively. All four Sparta based products carry a 35W TDP. Three of the Sparta based products have 256KB of L2 cache while the Sempron 3500+ only has 128KB of L2 cache.
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4942
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Opteron 148 DFI Ultra-D EVGA 7600GT KO 2x512mb Patriot LLK(TCCD) 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung SP2504C XP SP2 17" CRT Zippy GSM-6600P 600W 
Case
Centurion 5 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Opteron 148 DFI Ultra-D EVGA 7600GT KO 2x512mb Patriot LLK(TCCD) 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung SP2504C XP SP2 17" CRT Zippy GSM-6600P 600W 
Case
Centurion 5 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 19
so they're all 512kb cache versions? That's stupid as hell my friends.
Desktop
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX 8120 Gigabyte XA990-UD3 Gigabyte GTX670 Windforce III G. Skill RipJaws 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 Western Digital Blue LG Dual Layer Sata Antec Kuhler 920 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8 Dell 2007wfp 20.1" Logitech G710+ Corsair Professional HX650 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Coolermaster Silencio Steelseries Sensei [RAW] Func F10.s 
  hide details  
Reply
Desktop
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX 8120 Gigabyte XA990-UD3 Gigabyte GTX670 Windforce III G. Skill RipJaws 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 Western Digital Blue LG Dual Layer Sata Antec Kuhler 920 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8 Dell 2007wfp 20.1" Logitech G710+ Corsair Professional HX650 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Coolermaster Silencio Steelseries Sensei [RAW] Func F10.s 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 19
Thread Starter 
AMD doesn't really need extra cache, the performance loss/gain between 512kb and 1mb is so small that it can be entirely ignored

It's also cheaper to make 512kb than 1mb
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Opteron 148 DFI Ultra-D EVGA 7600GT KO 2x512mb Patriot LLK(TCCD) 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung SP2504C XP SP2 17" CRT Zippy GSM-6600P 600W 
Case
Centurion 5 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Opteron 148 DFI Ultra-D EVGA 7600GT KO 2x512mb Patriot LLK(TCCD) 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
250GB Samsung SP2504C XP SP2 17" CRT Zippy GSM-6600P 600W 
Case
Centurion 5 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by boredom View Post
AMD doesn't really need extra cache, the performance loss/gain between 512kb and 1mb is so small that it can be entirely ignored

It's also cheaper to make 512kb than 1mb
EXACTLY.
My Rig
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X3 720/(X4 @ 3.0 GHz) GIGABYTE MA770T-UD3P Sapphire Radeon HD 5770 (950/1435) 2x2GB G.Skill Ripjaw DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
WD 1TB 7200 32MB Windows 7 Ultimate (x64) Acer H213H (1080p) Corsair 750TX 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech G5 fUnc Surface 1030 
  hide details  
Reply
My Rig
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X3 720/(X4 @ 3.0 GHz) GIGABYTE MA770T-UD3P Sapphire Radeon HD 5770 (950/1435) 2x2GB G.Skill Ripjaw DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
WD 1TB 7200 32MB Windows 7 Ultimate (x64) Acer H213H (1080p) Corsair 750TX 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech G5 fUnc Surface 1030 
  hide details  
Reply
post #5 of 19
I think it is too little too late to sway me back to the AMD side for my next PC.

Looks like the Intel Dynasty to me
Desktop
(15 items)
 
 
Wark!
(13 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i5 750 Gigabyte P55-UD3L F7 OEM Nvidia GTS 240 8GB Kingston HyperX DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Toshiba Q Pro 128GB SSD 1TB Western Digital Blue Samsung DVDRW Logysis GammaX 300 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8 Pro w/Mediacenter LG IPS 235V Ducky DK 1008 OCN Edition (MX Blues) Antec 400C 
CaseMouseAudio
Cooler Master Centurion 534 Logitech MX518 Asus Xonar DG 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Core 2 Duo P8600 Intel GMA 4500MHD 4GB DDR3 1333 Intel 530 Series 180GB SSD 
Optical DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
None Windows 7 Pro 13.3" 1280x800 TFT LCD Stock 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i5 3470 HP Stock Intel HD 2500 8GB DDR3 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
500GB DVDRW Windows 7 Pro 64 Acer AL2002W 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft Standard Generic HP Pro 3500 Microsoft Standard 
  hide details  
Reply
Desktop
(15 items)
 
 
Wark!
(13 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i5 750 Gigabyte P55-UD3L F7 OEM Nvidia GTS 240 8GB Kingston HyperX DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Toshiba Q Pro 128GB SSD 1TB Western Digital Blue Samsung DVDRW Logysis GammaX 300 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8 Pro w/Mediacenter LG IPS 235V Ducky DK 1008 OCN Edition (MX Blues) Antec 400C 
CaseMouseAudio
Cooler Master Centurion 534 Logitech MX518 Asus Xonar DG 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Core 2 Duo P8600 Intel GMA 4500MHD 4GB DDR3 1333 Intel 530 Series 180GB SSD 
Optical DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
None Windows 7 Pro 13.3" 1280x800 TFT LCD Stock 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i5 3470 HP Stock Intel HD 2500 8GB DDR3 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
500GB DVDRW Windows 7 Pro 64 Acer AL2002W 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft Standard Generic HP Pro 3500 Microsoft Standard 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 19
i wonder how well these 65nm chips will overclock..........................
The pink bicycle
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
q6600 @ 3.4 GHz Asus P5N-E Asus 4890 1 gb 2 x 2 GB OCZ Reapers 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2 x 150 GB Raptors RAID0 work in progress Windows 7 7600 x64 19" Acer LCD 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft basic Antec 650w my desk mx518 
Mouse Pad
steelpad QcK+ 
  hide details  
Reply
The pink bicycle
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
q6600 @ 3.4 GHz Asus P5N-E Asus 4890 1 gb 2 x 2 GB OCZ Reapers 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2 x 150 GB Raptors RAID0 work in progress Windows 7 7600 x64 19" Acer LCD 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft basic Antec 650w my desk mx518 
Mouse Pad
steelpad QcK+ 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 19
Why are they all wierd speeds like 2100,2300,2500,2700mhz? Half Multi's?
Turismo
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E2160 @ 3.0GHz (BIOS 1.315v) (CPU-Z 1.272v) Abit IP35 "Dark Raider" ATI 512MB HD3850 (720/1800) 4GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-6400 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Corsair Force F60 + 640GB WD 2x250GB WD RAID0 Sony NEC 20x Dual Layer DVD±RW Windows 7 Ultimate 64 20.1' Belinea @ 1680x1050 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Corsair 450W VX 12V@33A CM690 + Zalman MFC1 Wolf King Trooper 
  hide details  
Reply
Turismo
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
E2160 @ 3.0GHz (BIOS 1.315v) (CPU-Z 1.272v) Abit IP35 "Dark Raider" ATI 512MB HD3850 (720/1800) 4GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-6400 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Corsair Force F60 + 640GB WD 2x250GB WD RAID0 Sony NEC 20x Dual Layer DVD±RW Windows 7 Ultimate 64 20.1' Belinea @ 1680x1050 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech Corsair 450W VX 12V@33A CM690 + Zalman MFC1 Wolf King Trooper 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by boredom View Post
AMD doesn't really need extra cache, the performance loss/gain between 512kb and 1mb is so small that it can be entirely ignored

It's also cheaper to make 512kb than 1mb
Yay for someone who finally understands that.

Intel needs the cache, AMD doesnt. If you like your menial 1% performance gain over it.. k buy it for the extra money.. im going for economics
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Athlon 3600+ X2 Biostar Tforce 550 BFG 7600GT OC Corsair XMS DDR675 2x1024 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
WD 160GB + WD 80GB SATA Windows XP Pro Compaq MV720 Logitech 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
FSP FX600-GLN Aspire X-Cruiser Black Razer Copperhead Tempest Ratzpad GS 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Athlon 3600+ X2 Biostar Tforce 550 BFG 7600GT OC Corsair XMS DDR675 2x1024 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
WD 160GB + WD 80GB SATA Windows XP Pro Compaq MV720 Logitech 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
FSP FX600-GLN Aspire X-Cruiser Black Razer Copperhead Tempest Ratzpad GS 
  hide details  
Reply
post #9 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jori View Post
Yay for someone who finally understands that.

Intel needs the cache, AMD doesnt. If you like your menial 1% performance gain over it.. k buy it for the extra money.. im going for economics
Yep Think like an economist...You get what you pay for = false!

We'll just have to wait and see how these perform (although they should be the same, not including OC).

Shouldn't 65nm be better for OC'ing?
Desktop
(15 items)
 
 
Wark!
(13 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i5 750 Gigabyte P55-UD3L F7 OEM Nvidia GTS 240 8GB Kingston HyperX DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Toshiba Q Pro 128GB SSD 1TB Western Digital Blue Samsung DVDRW Logysis GammaX 300 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8 Pro w/Mediacenter LG IPS 235V Ducky DK 1008 OCN Edition (MX Blues) Antec 400C 
CaseMouseAudio
Cooler Master Centurion 534 Logitech MX518 Asus Xonar DG 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Core 2 Duo P8600 Intel GMA 4500MHD 4GB DDR3 1333 Intel 530 Series 180GB SSD 
Optical DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
None Windows 7 Pro 13.3" 1280x800 TFT LCD Stock 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i5 3470 HP Stock Intel HD 2500 8GB DDR3 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
500GB DVDRW Windows 7 Pro 64 Acer AL2002W 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft Standard Generic HP Pro 3500 Microsoft Standard 
  hide details  
Reply
Desktop
(15 items)
 
 
Wark!
(13 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i5 750 Gigabyte P55-UD3L F7 OEM Nvidia GTS 240 8GB Kingston HyperX DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Toshiba Q Pro 128GB SSD 1TB Western Digital Blue Samsung DVDRW Logysis GammaX 300 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8 Pro w/Mediacenter LG IPS 235V Ducky DK 1008 OCN Edition (MX Blues) Antec 400C 
CaseMouseAudio
Cooler Master Centurion 534 Logitech MX518 Asus Xonar DG 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Core 2 Duo P8600 Intel GMA 4500MHD 4GB DDR3 1333 Intel 530 Series 180GB SSD 
Optical DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
None Windows 7 Pro 13.3" 1280x800 TFT LCD Stock 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core i5 3470 HP Stock Intel HD 2500 8GB DDR3 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
500GB DVDRW Windows 7 Pro 64 Acer AL2002W 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft Standard Generic HP Pro 3500 Microsoft Standard 
  hide details  
Reply
post #10 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by numlock2.0 View Post
Yep Think like an economist...You get what you pay for = false!

We'll just have to wait and see how these perform (although they should be the same, not including OC).

Shouldn't 65nm be better for OC'ing?
Yessir. Less heat, more possibilities.
My Rig
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X3 720/(X4 @ 3.0 GHz) GIGABYTE MA770T-UD3P Sapphire Radeon HD 5770 (950/1435) 2x2GB G.Skill Ripjaw DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
WD 1TB 7200 32MB Windows 7 Ultimate (x64) Acer H213H (1080p) Corsair 750TX 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech G5 fUnc Surface 1030 
  hide details  
Reply
My Rig
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X3 720/(X4 @ 3.0 GHz) GIGABYTE MA770T-UD3P Sapphire Radeon HD 5770 (950/1435) 2x2GB G.Skill Ripjaw DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
WD 1TB 7200 32MB Windows 7 Ultimate (x64) Acer H213H (1080p) Corsair 750TX 
MouseMouse Pad
Logitech G5 fUnc Surface 1030 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › AMD 65nm Product Plans Unveiled