Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [NS] NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Uses GK114 Kepler GPU, Is 15% Better than GTX 680
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[NS] NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Uses GK114 Kepler GPU, Is 15% Better than GTX 680 - Page 10  

post #91 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homeles View Post

No, it isn't. Even the folk that are typically biased towards AMD in this thread are behaving well. Unless there were some posts that were cleaned up, I really have no idea what you're going on about.
As far as 3D, FXAA and Adaptive V-Sync goes, it's all subjective. Stop trying to pass off your opinions as fact.

Ok i had to say partially not fully sorry about that. But the rest I stand by.
post #92 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin SSJ Eric View Post

You keep whining that people are hurling insults at you yet you opened up this argument by calling out "AMD fanboys". Nvidia's gimmicks do not justify their lower price/performance ratio compared to AMD's current lineup. The 680 doesn't do anything that the 7970 can't do better for less. The 7950 is the best performance bargain on the market today. Gimmicky vsync and barely utilized proprietary api's don't change that...

With the single exception of 3d vision. That's almost unquestionably better supported on Nvidia hardware. Tridef is pretty much horrible.

If 3d vision is what you want to do your only option is pretty much Nvidia.

Anyways, this is all kind of off-topic. Personally if GK110 doesn't pan out I'll be looking at a 8970 lightning assuming that they clock well. If it's another case of something like the 6900 series then I'm not sure what I'll be doing haha.

But I still very much doubt that nothing will be done with the excess GK110 chips.
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
post #93 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zero4549 View Post

What part of adaptive vsync doesn't really work, and everything else is just a proprietary version of an open source API, do you not understand?

This time i really did not understand. About adaptive vsync yes i get tearing sometimes but much less than vsync off. And when Vsync is on with tripple buffering its not a smooth experience like adaptive vsync.
post #94 of 236
This is not good.. Price cuts for the 680 are not gonna be as deep as I thought they were..

I really wanted to go SLi this gen..
Luftwaffe
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 4930k ASUS Rampage IV Formula EVGA GTX780 SLI Corsair Dominator Platinum 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 Barracuda 1TB No thanks.. Corsair H80 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
W7 64 Ultimate ASUS PB27Q Corsair K70 Corsair TX850M 
CaseMouseAudio
SilverStone Raven II Logitech G9 Creative Tactic3D Rage 
  hide details  
Luftwaffe
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 4930k ASUS Rampage IV Formula EVGA GTX780 SLI Corsair Dominator Platinum 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 Barracuda 1TB No thanks.. Corsair H80 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
W7 64 Ultimate ASUS PB27Q Corsair K70 Corsair TX850M 
CaseMouseAudio
SilverStone Raven II Logitech G9 Creative Tactic3D Rage 
  hide details  
post #95 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by kpriess View Post

This is not good.. Price cuts for the 680 are not gonna be as deep as I thought they were..
I really wanted to go SLi this gen..


Last gen's flagship GPU was 590 but it never gave twice the performance of a 580, or even twice the performance of 570. It was 30% better than a 580.

So when 680 came out it gave 99% the performance of 590, but that was the 590's fault. 690 on the other hand is almost literally twice 680.

Maybe people believed that the next gens 780 would be equal to 690 like how 680 was similar to 590 but that would not be a smart investment by Nvidia.

IF Ati's new 8xxx GPUs are at least 50-60% higher than the 7970 lets say, than yeah Nvidia would have to step up not to get left behind in the competition in terms of core power, but otherwise, they wouldn't bother.

I really never expected 780 to be at least 50% more powerful than 680. It wouldn't be a very smart business.

Even if 780 comes out with at least 50% more power than 680, than it would have to be sold much more expensive than today's current 680's price.

Personally I am glad that 780 wont be extremely powerful as it was hoped because i have no doubts to go 670 SLI now.
post #96 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homeles View Post

No, it isn't. Even the folk that are typically biased towards AMD in this thread are behaving well. Unless there were some posts that were cleaned up, I really have no idea what you're going on about.
As far as 3D, FXAA and Adaptive V-Sync goes, it's all subjective. Stop trying to pass off your opinions as fact.
You need to understand the difference between being an AMD fanboy and being anti-Nvidia. They are wholly separate.

Seeing your edit now and thank you for it as I can now understand. Anti-Nvidia was the point i wanted to make but I believe i used a wrong term. Sorry if people are offended.
post #97 of 236
Reopened.

No name calling or anything guys, civil discussion. Thanks.
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
post #98 of 236
What's the die area of gk114 compared to 104?
1
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 930 @ 3.6 Gigabyte x58a ud3r Gigabyte GV-R6870C-1GD Mushkin Redline 
Hard DriveOptical DriveMonitorKeyboard
2x 1TB Spinpoint samsung dvd burner Samsung p2370 + Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 930SB WASD keyboards v1 semi custom w/ cherry browns 
PowerCaseMouse
Antec CP-850 Antec P183 CM Storm Spawn 
  hide details  
1
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 930 @ 3.6 Gigabyte x58a ud3r Gigabyte GV-R6870C-1GD Mushkin Redline 
Hard DriveOptical DriveMonitorKeyboard
2x 1TB Spinpoint samsung dvd burner Samsung p2370 + Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 930SB WASD keyboards v1 semi custom w/ cherry browns 
PowerCaseMouse
Antec CP-850 Antec P183 CM Storm Spawn 
  hide details  
post #99 of 236
I'm not saying i expected this but...I expected this, Remember the jump from the 480 to the 580, it was only around 15-20% if I recall, this is right on cue, the 800 series is where we'll see another huge jump in performance, and honestly, I'm glad that it's only a small gain, that way i don't have to feel terrible for being an early adopter of Kepler.
Aloha Oe
(17 items)
 
QT
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I7 4700HQ MSI Laptop Board GTX 765m 16 gb 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
2x RAID0 128gb SSD's 1 TB Storage Drive WD My Pasport LG Slim Portable Blu-Ray Multi 
OSMonitorKeyboardCase
Windows H8 LG Flattron 24EA53V Ducky 9008G2 MSI GS70 UltraSlim Case 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Mad Catz R.A.T TE Razer Vespula Creative Soundblaster 2x Mids and a Sub (built in) Creative Gigaworks T40 
Audio
Blue Yeti 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Dual Core Nokia  Adreno 225 1024mb 
Hard DriveOSMonitorCase
32 GB Solid State Windows Phone 8.1 4.5 inch Ammoled @ 768x1280 Trident Aegis (red)  
Other
8.7mp Camera with Carl Zeiss Lens and Xenon Flash  
  hide details  
Aloha Oe
(17 items)
 
QT
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I7 4700HQ MSI Laptop Board GTX 765m 16 gb 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
2x RAID0 128gb SSD's 1 TB Storage Drive WD My Pasport LG Slim Portable Blu-Ray Multi 
OSMonitorKeyboardCase
Windows H8 LG Flattron 24EA53V Ducky 9008G2 MSI GS70 UltraSlim Case 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
Mad Catz R.A.T TE Razer Vespula Creative Soundblaster 2x Mids and a Sub (built in) Creative Gigaworks T40 
Audio
Blue Yeti 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Dual Core Nokia  Adreno 225 1024mb 
Hard DriveOSMonitorCase
32 GB Solid State Windows Phone 8.1 4.5 inch Ammoled @ 768x1280 Trident Aegis (red)  
Other
8.7mp Camera with Carl Zeiss Lens and Xenon Flash  
  hide details  
post #100 of 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsa700 View Post

It's not like we need a 780 that's 2x as fast as the 680.

The 680/7970 are already fast enough to run any game out there at "retina" (1440 and 1600p) resolutions.

So why bother?

Let's see a single GPU run a game at 7680x1440 at 240hz 3D (120hz per eye), with everything maxed out. Let's see any current GPU run a game at 60fps with pure raytracing only. Neither of those are even close right now, technology has a LONG way to go.
Foldatron
(17 items)
 
Mat
(10 items)
 
Work iMac
(9 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 950 EVGA x58 3-way SLI EVGA GTX 660ti GTX 275 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
3x2GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 80GB Intel X25-M SSD 2TB WD Black 150GB WD Raptor 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
2x 150GB WD V-raptor in RAID0 Win7 Home 64-bit OEM 55" LED 120hz 1080p Vizio MS Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 
PowerCase
750W PC P&C Silencer CoolerMaster 690 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i5 2500S AMD 6770M 8GB (2x4GB) at 1333Mhz 1TB, 7200 rpm 
Optical DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
LG 8X Dual-Layer "SuperDrive" OS X Lion 27" iMac screen Mac wireless keyboard 
Mouse
Mac wireless mouse 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i7-2600K AMD 6970M 1GB 16GB PC3-10600 DDR3 1TB 7200rpm 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
256GB SSD 8x DL "SuperDrive" OS X 10.7 Lion 27" 2560x1440 iMac display 
Monitor
27" Apple thunderbolt display 
  hide details  
Foldatron
(17 items)
 
Mat
(10 items)
 
Work iMac
(9 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 950 EVGA x58 3-way SLI EVGA GTX 660ti GTX 275 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
3x2GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600 80GB Intel X25-M SSD 2TB WD Black 150GB WD Raptor 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
2x 150GB WD V-raptor in RAID0 Win7 Home 64-bit OEM 55" LED 120hz 1080p Vizio MS Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 
PowerCase
750W PC P&C Silencer CoolerMaster 690 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel Core i5 2500S AMD 6770M 8GB (2x4GB) at 1333Mhz 1TB, 7200 rpm 
Optical DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
LG 8X Dual-Layer "SuperDrive" OS X Lion 27" iMac screen Mac wireless keyboard 
Mouse
Mac wireless mouse 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
i7-2600K AMD 6970M 1GB 16GB PC3-10600 DDR3 1TB 7200rpm 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
256GB SSD 8x DL "SuperDrive" OS X 10.7 Lion 27" 2560x1440 iMac display 
Monitor
27" Apple thunderbolt display 
  hide details  
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles
This thread is locked  
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [NS] NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Uses GK114 Kepler GPU, Is 15% Better than GTX 680