Quote:
Originally Posted by
duox 
I certainly disagree with the thumb placement in that photo , theres rarely a universalscience on how to hold things, you should see how unnaturally I hold a gold club or tennis racket but it works. I rest my thumb under the side buttons and my palm is comfortablly guiding the mouse still not a claw grip.
A golf club or tennis racket are simple designs though. The DeathAdder is an ergonomically designed mouse that was designed for a specific way of holding it.
It's
clearly not intended to be held in such a way that your wrist is parallel to the desk:

This is why there are left and right-handed versions of the DeathAdder.
A symmetrical ambidextrous mouse would be more comparable to something like the golf club or tennis racket in your example.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
resis 
When I used the Deathadder, I had the thumb like in the picture with the red X. I activated the back button with the thumbs knuckle by moving the thumb up and the front button with the thumb tip. That way I had not to bend the thumb and use the tip for both buttons, means less movement, faster response.
My thumb is resting on both buttons there. There's
no movement to press either button.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MONVMENTVM 
You guys seem not to understand what I meant before. Yes I know the Deathadder isn't designed for the ring finger to rest on the right MB. But that in combination with the wider front makes the mouse rotate counter-clock wise inside your hand...

This happens when you have your wrist parallel to the desk with the DeathAdder shape, rather than at a 10-15° angle.
On the left is holding the DeathAdder "correctly" with my wrist at the angle the mouse is designed for, on the right is holding it with my thumb below the side buttons, wrist parallel to the desk:

Note how much more relaxed my fingers are on the left. (weird colors due to the lighting in here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MONVMENTVM 
In the following image you can see how my index finger would rather rest naturally (without forcing it away from the middle finger). Now during usage my index finger never rests on the mousewheel as you can see here (as I actively keep it away of course) but I find myself often touching the side of the wheel. So not a BIG issue but after a while forcing the index finger out gets it tired a little, which is enough to show that the design isn't perfectly thought through.

This is much more like the position your fingers are put into when you have your wrist at an angle on the DeathAdder, except they are curved around the shell, rather than held out straight.
You're holding the DeathAdder as if it were an ambidextrous mouse (like the Lachesis) not an ergonomic one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
popups 
I know that the mouse is designed for the middle finger on mouse 2. But I never had issues with other mice that also "intend" to have that placement. The Zowie is very similar and I have no real issues with that mouse with the same grip.
It is funny that people say I hold a mouse wrong. I hold a mouse the most natural way for my hand size. I relax my hand and place it on a mouse. I don't allow my hands to touch the mouse pad. I try to use my palm to lift the mouse by bringing the thumb and small finger toward one another. Another reason I place my middle finger on the scroll wheel is because I use it just as much or if not more than I do mouse 2. I use mwheeldown as jump and mouse 3 as voice communications. Since scroll wheel is always busy I need to use the ring finger to take the position of mouse 2.
There's nothing wrong with wanting to have three fingers on the top of the mouse, but when I do that, I find that my hand position moves forward, and I am starting to grip the mouse when moving it, rather than just resting my hand on the mouse. As you say you lift the mouse a lot (I don't lift at all really) which tells me that you are definitely gripping the mouse, rather than resting on it.
I
can't be gripping a mouse when using it all day, because it causes me serious RSI pain, which was a problem for me with the Roccat Savu as that requires you to grip it, due to its narrow design.
I often do end up with three fingers on the mouse when using it in Windows, but when I'm gaming, I'm moving the mouse around a lot more, and at faster speeds, which means I grip it more tightly with my little finger which causes pain after a short period of time.
It's still easy to hold the mouse with your wrist at an angle and your thumb on the buttons with three fingers on top, but if you're lifting the mouse a lot, I can see why you wouldn't want to keep your thumb there. The DeathAdder shape doesn't seem to have been designed with that style of gameplay in mind, which would also explain the weight, and high lift-off distance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Methoxetamine 
Maybe because my hands are too large? I can palm a G400 just fine but not a Deathadder as it's not long enough.
I think it depends how you position your hand on the arch. They're basically the same length, but the G400 has a much flatter profile than the DeathAdder:

I feel bad for making the "you're holding it wrong" argument, but the mouse is
clearly not designed to be held with your wrist parallel to the desk, unlike the G400 which has a much shallower angle and flatter profile.
It's too bad they don't offer an ambidextrous mouse with the DeathAdder sensor in it, because it seems like that's what most of you actually want. (whether you realize it or not)
Edited by NotAgain - 11/8/12 at 7:21pm