Originally Posted by losttsol
That's why I said for picture alone. I understand there are reasons not to get a plasma, but they still give the best overall picture quality. The best LEDs still do not match them for color quality and black levels.
Edit: Also talking about soap opera look to a TV. That is from the TV having certain video processing effects on (built in or manually set), not from the refresh rate.
Don't dispute what they're capable of regarding colour, but it isn't that big a deal breaker to me. Like I said, I'm a gamer and not having to worry about burning in HUD's etc is more important to me, no matter how common or not it can be. Keeping the running costs low is pretty important aswell seems it's being used alot, which the Sharp has a good energy rating. Hell, I just love the extra 10 inches. :)
And the TV is still 100hz without the dejudder feature. I double checked that on the manufacturers site (I dare say the Panasonics 2000hz was synthetic, lol). I'll be quite honest it's more than enough for me considering I don't get any judder at all (even if that's mostly a built in function). Played Battlefield 3 on it last night and it was awesome, playing Resident Evil 6 on it scares the crap out of me I get that engrossed in it (thanks to the size).
I guess I'm just weird. I've been in stores with a ton of tv's on display and just standing around the LED models just had the best picture, for me. I love the high synthetic refresh rates.
Regardless, that's a nice TV OP.
Edited by Lifeshield - 10/27/12 at 1:36am
I guess visual is like audio. What's best is subjective to the user (or users).
And thanks. It really is a pretty good TV that has more than met my expectations considering it's size, image quality, and what I paid for it.