Quote:
Originally Posted by
anubis44 
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KyadCK 
Yay, gaming benchmark!
Today I bring you a usage bench (numbers provided by HWiNFO64) on Planetside 2.

I didn't have my GPUs in crossfire for this, but that's fine since it didn't max the CPU or GPU anyway. This is fully maxed at 1080p (would be 6020x1080, but there's a hud glitch, so I can't play that way) 60FPS vSync locked.
I didn't test it during any big battles, because there were none. I'll do that later today. This is just flying around in a Reaver, shooting at some stuff.
Most important is that cluster 2/3rds in. It uses 6 threads!
This is encouraging news. I'm hearing all over the web how game engines and other software are being compiled or re-compiled to work with as many cores as you've got, and it all seems to be happening at once!
Incidentally, KyadCK, I took a look at the pics of your rig and noticed you don't seem to have any special mods/cooling for your northbridge or VRMs. Did you do anything to the thermal paste/pads on your 990FX-UD3, or are they stock and running just fine as they came out of the box? I'm asking because if you're getting 5GHz out of your 8320 on that UD3 board without any VRM/NB overheating issues, I'm sold on it, and I'll go out and buy one tomorrow while they're still on sale near me.
Also, if you could tell me which revision of the 990FX-UD3 your motherboard is, that would be amazing.
Thanks!
My H100's fans are intake, so the massive airflow (4 stock H100 Corsair fans at 60%) from that is all going right down onto the VRM cooler. I have not done anything to the motherboard itself, but I am also not using any FSB/NB/HT OC at all. I did add a 80mm fan because I did it to show an example and just decided to leave it since it didn't look bad, but I had the 5.0 long before then.

The board is a rev 1.1. In all honesty though, If you can get a UD7, do it. It has far superior cooling on the board, and the x16s are even farther apart.
Also, keep in mind the shear amount of voltage I'm shoving down this thing (1.536v after LLC... less then my 970BE actually

) and the amount of heat that makes to keep 5.0. It's not happening under 1.5v.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rvaughn 
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KyadCK 
People with BD/PD fail Prime at
stock. ....
Then by definition their system ISN'T stable. Sorry, but that's a "duh" to me.
Maybe when I hear about all the cases where prime95 passes a system, but other stress test programs cause a failure, we'll have found a problem with prime95.
If multiple chips fail at stock, then it is the program. The sooner you accept that, the better off you'll be.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FX-8320 
I think the main issue here is many die hard overclockers have been using Prime 95 for years, and to have it suddenly fail, is in all certain fail.
Maybe there needs to be some kind of offical disclaimer (from someone that can confirm from AMD or respectable), that says these processors will fail normally with Prime 95, because until then people here are just going to keep on going by "yes my system is Prime 95 stable". if that is not really the case in any given circumstance.
Eh, like I said, don't put too much weight behind one program. In this thread, IBT has been king due to Prime's problems and IBT does push the chip even harder (and thus hotter) then Prime. Personally, I consider a full day of gaming (on each of my games) + recording + encoding + normal use stable. You'll notice I'm the one playing games with my OC rather then pulling my hair out wondering why an overrated program freezes my system.
