Quote:
Originally Posted by mechtech 
This is why NVIDIA has had such a tough time with Tegra, because they aren't good at this side of the business (which is actually the main job in a project like this). "Sorry, your chip uses .05 mw too much, or the package is too big, or too rectangular, or doesn't work with x,y,z" That's mobile chip design in a nutshell.

This is why NVIDIA has had such a tough time with Tegra, because they aren't good at this side of the business (which is actually the main job in a project like this). "Sorry, your chip uses .05 mw too much, or the package is too big, or too rectangular, or doesn't work with x,y,z" That's mobile chip design in a nutshell.
When exactly did Nvidia have a tough time with Tegra? It seems to me that tablet makers can't get enough Tegra. I'm pretty sure it's the most popular chip among the high end tablets. And they keep demanding more, aren't they already on Tegra 3?
I can't speak for how much profit AMD would make if they started producing ARM chips. But I'm sure they could do a darn good job of it. What ARM lacks is a true leader in hardware production. Many have tried, and at best have enjoyed only temporary success. AMD has the know-how and the production capacity to succeed where others have failed at becoming the "go-to" ARM chip manufacturer.
Android and WindowsRT should produce more than enough demand for high end ARM chips, not even mentioning the server market.










