Quote:
Originally Posted by zephiK 
Overclock.net's theme wasn't broke. They "fixed" it by implementing this one.
Phones weren't broke in the old days. People fixed it and turned them into "smartphones."
Sandy Bridge processors weren't broke, they came out with a sequel--Ivy Bridge.
Your logic makes no sense.
Creativity leads to innovation and money. Not sitting on your butt producing the same software and never releasing a sequel. Microsoft is a business, it's what businesses do, they keep moving forward and that strikes with a risk--a failure or a success.
Overclock.net's theme wasn't broke. They "fixed" it by implementing this one.
Phones weren't broke in the old days. People fixed it and turned them into "smartphones."
Sandy Bridge processors weren't broke, they came out with a sequel--Ivy Bridge.
Your logic makes no sense.
Creativity leads to innovation and money. Not sitting on your butt producing the same software and never releasing a sequel. Microsoft is a business, it's what businesses do, they keep moving forward and that strikes with a risk--a failure or a success.
You think tearing apart his one line will change his mind?
This thread was not supposed to have this kind of arguing in it per the OP, so can we keep it nice and on topic?
k.thanx
Malice
(18 items) |
|
Malice
(18 items) |
. And it will probably be more expensive because it won't sell like Win7 did.
