Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › AMD/ATI › Using older (more compatible) scanning method?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Using older (more compatible) scanning method?

post #1 of 3
Thread Starter 
Although it seems I can get the clocks up higher, am I hurting the card? Is Ati-Tool actually overlooking certain artifacts when we use this older method?
Thanks alot m8's
Overclock_Machine
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX-60 DFI LP nF4 SLI-DR Expert 4890 BH-5 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Tiny7 23" awesome Corsair TX-850 
Case
None 
  hide details  
Reply
Overclock_Machine
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX-60 DFI LP nF4 SLI-DR Expert 4890 BH-5 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Tiny7 23" awesome Corsair TX-850 
Case
None 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 3
No ATiTool shouldn't be overlooking certain things. Also, if your card couldn't handle the clocks it would just VPU recover so it shouldn't damage your cards as long as you are resonable. Volts on the other hand will damage your cards permanently if they are too high with unsuccicent cooling, but I don't think your messing with Volts.
mATX Sandy Bridge
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-2500K ASRock Z68 Pro3-M Gigabyte 5770 2x4GB Kingston 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1GB SAMSUNG Spinpoint F3 ASUS DRW-24B1ST Windows 7 1901FP (Ancient) 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
OCZ ModXStream 600W SILVERSTONE SUGO SG02-BF Mx518 QcK+ 
  hide details  
Reply
mATX Sandy Bridge
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5-2500K ASRock Z68 Pro3-M Gigabyte 5770 2x4GB Kingston 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1GB SAMSUNG Spinpoint F3 ASUS DRW-24B1ST Windows 7 1901FP (Ancient) 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
OCZ ModXStream 600W SILVERSTONE SUGO SG02-BF Mx518 QcK+ 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 3
whichever is lower is probably the better thing to do.

If one thing can make it artifact...then obvs it's artifacting...

What if the game stresses it like that andi t artifacts?
Desktop
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX 8120 Gigabyte XA990-UD3 Gigabyte GTX670 Windforce III G. Skill RipJaws 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 Western Digital Blue LG Dual Layer Sata Antec Kuhler 920 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8 Dell 2007wfp 20.1" Logitech G710+ Corsair Professional HX650 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Coolermaster Silencio Steelseries Sensei [RAW] Func F10.s 
  hide details  
Reply
Desktop
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX 8120 Gigabyte XA990-UD3 Gigabyte GTX670 Windforce III G. Skill RipJaws 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 Western Digital Blue LG Dual Layer Sata Antec Kuhler 920 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8 Dell 2007wfp 20.1" Logitech G710+ Corsair Professional HX650 
CaseMouseMouse Pad
Coolermaster Silencio Steelseries Sensei [RAW] Func F10.s 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD/ATI
Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › AMD/ATI › Using older (more compatible) scanning method?