Here we go, yet again 
Don't EVER quote PC power consumption figures and use them for consoles.....
Completely and utterly wrong, you my friend need to learn the difference between hardware utilisation and software efficiently, Every single game on PS3 uses as close to 100% of the hardware, difference is how efficient they're at using the machine.
And how many of those games render a true HD frame buffer? NONE.... They're about as HD as the current Call Of Duty games are.
Cherry picking ideas are we? And they still would not be able to run those at 4k on 360, you seem to have no clue of just how much processing power is required for 4k.
Would not be that much work? Yea right, again proving your lack of technical knowledge
Google it, it's scientifically proven...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutuz 
Look at this overclocked HD7850, it uses 122w at load for the card only, those numbers are (as far as I can tell) full, 100% load ie like Furmark which the custom AIC HD7990 reviews are showing can make a significantly higher number than what will be there in reality, the TDP on the 5800k is also higher TDP than the A10-5700, despite having clocks within 200Mhz Turbo clocks and being clocked higher for Turbo than the other 100w Trinity APU, it's well known AMDs TDP numbers are more worst case scenarios plus as you can see here, the power consumption while gaming is lower than doing something designed to use as much of the CPU as possible, games will always have times when it has to wait for the GPU, etc.
Look at this overclocked HD7850, it uses 122w at load for the card only, those numbers are (as far as I can tell) full, 100% load ie like Furmark which the custom AIC HD7990 reviews are showing can make a significantly higher number than what will be there in reality, the TDP on the 5800k is also higher TDP than the A10-5700, despite having clocks within 200Mhz Turbo clocks and being clocked higher for Turbo than the other 100w Trinity APU, it's well known AMDs TDP numbers are more worst case scenarios plus as you can see here, the power consumption while gaming is lower than doing something designed to use as much of the CPU as possible, games will always have times when it has to wait for the GPU, etc.
Don't EVER quote PC power consumption figures and use them for consoles.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutuz
The PS3 also had a 380w PSU, I also want to see Uncharted 3 numbers on a launch PS3..That would be actually using most of the hardware to its fullest whereas the launch titles wouldn't, as 7800GTX + Core 2 Duo/Athlon64 power consumption vs a PS3 would prove.
The PS3 also had a 380w PSU, I also want to see Uncharted 3 numbers on a launch PS3..That would be actually using most of the hardware to its fullest whereas the launch titles wouldn't, as 7800GTX + Core 2 Duo/Athlon64 power consumption vs a PS3 would prove.
Completely and utterly wrong, you my friend need to learn the difference between hardware utilisation and software efficiently, Every single game on PS3 uses as close to 100% of the hardware, difference is how efficient they're at using the machine.
Quote:
And how many of those games render a true HD frame buffer? NONE.... They're about as HD as the current Call Of Duty games are.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutuz
Much like how some 360 games manage to support 1080p despite how most games can't due to the lack of graphical prowess or the like. but you can't run around saying games like Minecraft, Osmos, Qubed, Plants vs. Zombies, etc would all require ultra high-end GPUs to run at 4k res and wouldn't benefit from the higher resolution.
Much like how some 360 games manage to support 1080p despite how most games can't due to the lack of graphical prowess or the like. but you can't run around saying games like Minecraft, Osmos, Qubed, Plants vs. Zombies, etc would all require ultra high-end GPUs to run at 4k res and wouldn't benefit from the higher resolution.
Cherry picking ideas are we? And they still would not be able to run those at 4k on 360, you seem to have no clue of just how much processing power is required for 4k.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutuz
Some games will have support simply because they'd still be at a fluid FPS at 4K resolution, it wouldn't require much work to do and would give them a marketing bullet point.
Some games will have support simply because they'd still be at a fluid FPS at 4K resolution, it wouldn't require much work to do and would give them a marketing bullet point.
Would not be that much work? Yea right, again proving your lack of technical knowledge
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutuz
I've seen many people say that, but at 3m I can see the difference when I'm wearing glasses/contact lenses and I'm very shorted sighted (I can't see more than 10cm without squinting without correcting lenses). I want to see actual proof.
I've seen many people say that, but at 3m I can see the difference when I'm wearing glasses/contact lenses and I'm very shorted sighted (I can't see more than 10cm without squinting without correcting lenses). I want to see actual proof.
Google it, it's scientifically proven...
Considering the current memory prices I'm hoping for about 8 GB (plus hopefully at least 1 GB of GDDR5 for the discrete graphics card part). The 7850 would be strong enough to push the "next big thing" the 4k resolution displays at decent framerate and prettier graphics than current consoles. Considering that at 4k resolution the AA would not be needed at all. Assuming they put in there a connectivity which has sufficient bandwidth and I would be surprised if they would not use HDMI 1.4a or DisplayPort 1.2. Hopefully both 
