It's been known for a few weeks since the reviews.
OSX takes 7GB.... should Apple advertise MBA having 56GB of SSD or can they continue to advertise 64GB SSD?
Absolutely and utterly wrong.
This has how devices have been advertised for over 30 years. If a MBA has a 64GB SSD and the OS takes 7GB.... what number is marketed? If you go buy ANY PC with Windows installed, what number is listed for the disk space? If you buy ANY smartphone, does the storage space ever list the size of OS and pre-installed applications?
2) Better compatiblity? Not really.... File system is a file system. The onboard storage usually has a slightly better controller.... usually. However, it generlally still sucks since it's just a single eMMC package with not enough channels. Onboard storage performance won't increase until companies start implementing more SSD-derived features.
3) What do you know of coding? The size of an application does not necessarily indictate bloat or inefficiencies. This is especially true if you don't compare functionality.

I have seen some marketing material display the free space but it's rare.
Edited by DuckieHo - 11/6/12 at 8:29am
Quote:
Nope, it does have a 32GB (not 32Gb) SSD storage.OSX takes 7GB.... should Apple advertise MBA having 56GB of SSD or can they continue to advertise 64GB SSD?
Quote:
Originally Posted by joman2055 
what you guys fail to realize is that the general public does not know as much as you geniuses.
if the average joe goes and buys a device that is advertised as 32gb, he is expecting that he can put 32gb worth of stuff on it. he hasnt calculated in his head how much space the OS takes up, or assumed that the 32GB is BEFORE the OS. the general public probably doesnt care/realize that their computer is like this simply because when the HDD is 500+GB that few gigs windows takes up is irrelevant
my 32gb ipod has pretty close to 32gb free, if it was 16gb, people would feak the hell out.
so yea, i understand why people are upset. if you dont have anywhere near 32GB of free space, dont advertise it as a 32GB model!
(I would be interested to know how much free space a 32GB ipad has on it)

what you guys fail to realize is that the general public does not know as much as you geniuses.
if the average joe goes and buys a device that is advertised as 32gb, he is expecting that he can put 32gb worth of stuff on it. he hasnt calculated in his head how much space the OS takes up, or assumed that the 32GB is BEFORE the OS. the general public probably doesnt care/realize that their computer is like this simply because when the HDD is 500+GB that few gigs windows takes up is irrelevant
my 32gb ipod has pretty close to 32gb free, if it was 16gb, people would feak the hell out.
so yea, i understand why people are upset. if you dont have anywhere near 32GB of free space, dont advertise it as a 32GB model!
(I would be interested to know how much free space a 32GB ipad has on it)
Absolutely and utterly wrong.
This has how devices have been advertised for over 30 years. If a MBA has a 64GB SSD and the OS takes 7GB.... what number is marketed? If you go buy ANY PC with Windows installed, what number is listed for the disk space? If you buy ANY smartphone, does the storage space ever list the size of OS and pre-installed applications?
Quote:
This is how stuff has been advertised for decades... nothing new or shady. It's like the difference between GB and GiB....Originally Posted by Fuell 
Yea, I feel we're at the point where memory is cheap enough for them to make sure you get close to the same GB as advertised after system is installed. I guess they've gotten away with it for so long and its technically correct. But it is rather shady to advertise as 32GB when they know full well its significantly less.
Would make a great marketing strategy. "When we say your buying a 32GB device, we give you 32GB of space to call your own, to add your music, your videos, your photos, anything you need." I'd be swayed to look more closely at such a company that did this.
Oh well, lifes a garden, dig it.

Yea, I feel we're at the point where memory is cheap enough for them to make sure you get close to the same GB as advertised after system is installed. I guess they've gotten away with it for so long and its technically correct. But it is rather shady to advertise as 32GB when they know full well its significantly less.
Would make a great marketing strategy. "When we say your buying a 32GB device, we give you 32GB of space to call your own, to add your music, your videos, your photos, anything you need." I'd be swayed to look more closely at such a company that did this.
Oh well, lifes a garden, dig it.
Quote:
1) Not the same. Go buy any computer or smartphone with an pre-installed OS.... se what number is listed.Originally Posted by raclimja 
1. the tablet is advertised as having 32gb of memory but in reality, you can only use 16gb. how would you feel if you buy something like an ssd that is advertised as 64gb but you only get 32gb of storage?
2. the onboard storage has better compatibility with apps and it is faster than sd card. i myself own a Sandisk Ultra 64GB Class 10 microsdxc and the onboard memory is still faster especially on write speed as the sd card could only do 10mbps
3. it shows how bloated and inefficient in code and size windows is

1. the tablet is advertised as having 32gb of memory but in reality, you can only use 16gb. how would you feel if you buy something like an ssd that is advertised as 64gb but you only get 32gb of storage?
2. the onboard storage has better compatibility with apps and it is faster than sd card. i myself own a Sandisk Ultra 64GB Class 10 microsdxc and the onboard memory is still faster especially on write speed as the sd card could only do 10mbps
3. it shows how bloated and inefficient in code and size windows is
2) Better compatiblity? Not really.... File system is a file system. The onboard storage usually has a slightly better controller.... usually. However, it generlally still sucks since it's just a single eMMC package with not enough channels. Onboard storage performance won't increase until companies start implementing more SSD-derived features.
3) What do you know of coding? The size of an application does not necessarily indictate bloat or inefficiencies. This is especially true if you don't compare functionality.
Quote:
CRT use to market corner-to-corner..... including the bezel. LCDs finally resolved this with marketing corner-to-corner of only the viewable area. Originally Posted by Particle 
It's more honest than the old days of CRT size measurements where you would see something like "21-inch monitor (19.7-inches viewable)". We could learn something from that though and sell tablet devices that way so that customers are more clear on what they're getting: "64 GB internal solid state drive (46 GB free)".

It's more honest than the old days of CRT size measurements where you would see something like "21-inch monitor (19.7-inches viewable)". We could learn something from that though and sell tablet devices that way so that customers are more clear on what they're getting: "64 GB internal solid state drive (46 GB free)".
I have seen some marketing material display the free space but it's rare.
Edited by DuckieHo - 11/6/12 at 8:29am







