Lol, a ~64Gb SSD sounds great!
"The slow phase-out of SSDs based on SandForce's first-gen controller is prompting really good prices on those products, since it costs almost as much to manufacture drives armed with a second-gen chip. As a result, Corsair's 30 GB Nova 2 serves as our entry point for those looking for an inexpensive SSD.
A word of caution about the way Corsair words its specs, though: this 30 GB SSD's sequential write performance is overstated at 250 MB/s. The company provides a single performance number for all of its capacities. We know that's not accurate. Its actual write performance should max out closer to 100 MB/s or so.
Although the raw throughput of a low-capacity SSD might not be as high as a larger model, it's still a lot more responsive than a mechanical hard drive, and that's what you can actually "feel." At this point, we'd avoid less expensive SSDs like the previously-recommended 16 GB Kingston S100, since it only has enough space for a 32-bit version of Windows 7. Windows 7 64-bit requires 20 GB (as will Windows 8), so snagging a 30 GB model gives you a little more freedom. There's not enough room for much else; however, if you manually manage your spare capacity, booting from a low-capacity SSD can significantly improve system responsiveness. "
-
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-recommendation-benchmark,3269-2.html
I guess you can't believe everything you read on the internet
