Quote:
Originally Posted by G3RG 
Actually it is.
AMD is stuck in a vicious cycle. They have little money, so they can't afford as many engineers. They can't afford many engineers, so their product suffers. Their product suffers, and they don't sell as much. They don't sell as much, and then they're back to having little money.
Intel on the otherhand is sitting on mountains of cash and income because they've had success in the market. However, their success in the market is partly due to their terrible business practices.
Actually it is.
AMD is stuck in a vicious cycle. They have little money, so they can't afford as many engineers. They can't afford many engineers, so their product suffers. Their product suffers, and they don't sell as much. They don't sell as much, and then they're back to having little money.
Intel on the otherhand is sitting on mountains of cash and income because they've had success in the market. However, their success in the market is partly due to their terrible business practices.
AMD though that 120398902134 cores is the way to go. And how more engineers gives better results? 0.o
Their GPU's don't suck...
MyCrap v1.2
(19 items) |
|
MyCrap v1.2
(19 items) |
From what they say..They're not even trying to come with something better, and complacent with what they're doing. 
"Oh, It's good enough" Umm..no..it's not.
