If I weren't editing photos and videos, I would still use SSDs.
I never turn off my PC, so I could care less about boot times. The only games I play that even benefit from the extra speed is skyrim and bioshock, both of which I don't play that much right now.
Applications don't load too much faster than a normal hard drive, and I have limited space.
HOWEVER, when I overclock my PC, I have to turn off and on my PC SEVERAL times. On a mechanical drive, the boot time can take forever. With my raid 0 ssds, I boot right into windows and I can begin testing my system.
Another nice thing is that when you have a mechanical drive, after a while of use, the drive really starts to slow down. Files and .DLLs can vanish for no freaking reason and eventually you are forced to clean your drive. Cleaning my drive involves a full windows format for me. But with an SSD, they are so fast that even when they do slow down, they don't completely bog down the system. So instead of formatting windows every 2 months, I do it every 8 or 9 months.
These are just a few of my personal reasons. I obviously have other reasons, but as I mentioned before, they involve editing and I think that if I made the comment that SSDs are really good for editing that peoples responses would be "NO DUH!!!!" .
On a separate note, I just took a look at your sig rig, and I think you have two issues regarding your SSD. One is you are running an AMD system. There is not a single AMD configuration I know of that would give you the full performance of your drive or any drive for that matter. The other is that 64 GB is small and when it fills up, the drive will slow down a little bit.
I suggest that you do a benchmark and a real world test to see what the speed of the drive is. I bet you 30 bucks that the drive performance is going to come in way under spec.
I never turn off my PC, so I could care less about boot times. The only games I play that even benefit from the extra speed is skyrim and bioshock, both of which I don't play that much right now.
Applications don't load too much faster than a normal hard drive, and I have limited space.
HOWEVER, when I overclock my PC, I have to turn off and on my PC SEVERAL times. On a mechanical drive, the boot time can take forever. With my raid 0 ssds, I boot right into windows and I can begin testing my system.
Another nice thing is that when you have a mechanical drive, after a while of use, the drive really starts to slow down. Files and .DLLs can vanish for no freaking reason and eventually you are forced to clean your drive. Cleaning my drive involves a full windows format for me. But with an SSD, they are so fast that even when they do slow down, they don't completely bog down the system. So instead of formatting windows every 2 months, I do it every 8 or 9 months.
These are just a few of my personal reasons. I obviously have other reasons, but as I mentioned before, they involve editing and I think that if I made the comment that SSDs are really good for editing that peoples responses would be "NO DUH!!!!" .
On a separate note, I just took a look at your sig rig, and I think you have two issues regarding your SSD. One is you are running an AMD system. There is not a single AMD configuration I know of that would give you the full performance of your drive or any drive for that matter. The other is that 64 GB is small and when it fills up, the drive will slow down a little bit.
I suggest that you do a benchmark and a real world test to see what the speed of the drive is. I bet you 30 bucks that the drive performance is going to come in way under spec.






.


